Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Bioactive Compounds: A Comprehensive Guide for Pharmaceutical Research and Development

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive examination of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction as a green technology for isolating bioactive compounds for pharmaceutical applications. It covers the foundational principles of SC-CO2, its advantages over conventional solvent-based methods, and detailed methodological approaches for extracting various bioactive classes including flavonoids, phenolics, terpenoids, and carotenoids. The content explores advanced optimization strategies using techniques like Response Surface Methodology and the strategic use of co-solvents. Furthermore, it presents rigorous comparative analyses validating SC-CO2's efficacy in preserving bioactive integrity and enhancing antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, offering critical insights for researchers and drug development professionals seeking efficient, sustainable extraction platforms.

Principles and Potentials of Supercritical CO2 in Bioactive Compound Extraction

Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO₂) is a state of carbon dioxide where it is held at or above its critical temperature of 304.128 K (30.978 °C) and critical pressure of 7.3773 MPa (73.773 bar) [1]. Under these conditions, CO₂ adopts properties midway between a gas and a liquid [1]. It expands to fill its container like a gas but possesses a density comparable to that of a liquid [1]. This unique combination of properties, along with its low toxicity, non-flammability, and environmental acceptability, has established scCO₂ as an important commercial and industrial solvent, particularly in the extraction of bioactive compounds from natural biomass [1] [2].

The solvating power of scCOâ‚‚ is highly tunable; the solubility of many extracted compounds varies with pressure, permitting highly selective extractions [1]. The relatively low temperature of the process and the stability of COâ‚‚ allow for the extraction of heat-sensitive compounds with little damage or denaturing, making it an ideal medium for pharmaceuticals and food products [1] [2].

SC-CO2 as a Green Solvent for Bioactives

Supercritical COâ‚‚ extraction is increasingly recognized as a green and efficient alternative to conventional solvent-based techniques for valorizing plant biomass [2]. Its unique physicochemical properties combine gas-like diffusivity with liquid-like solvating power, enabling selective extraction under mild and tunable conditions [2].

The adoption of scCOâ‚‚ technology across the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries is driven by several key advantages over traditional organic solvents [2]. scCOâ‚‚ eliminates toxic solvent residues in the final extract, a critical consideration for pharmaceutical and food applications. The process also reduces energy consumption considerably, as the separation of the solvent from the extract is achieved simply by depressurization [2]. Furthermore, it offers greater extraction precision, as the solvating power can be finely adjusted by changing pressure and temperature, allowing for the selective isolation of target compounds [2]. This results in high-purity extracts with minimal energy input and solvent waste, supporting the principles of green chemistry and a circular bioeconomy [2].

Table 1: Advantages of SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction for Bioactive Compounds

Advantage	Impact on Bioactive Extraction
Low-Temperature Operation	Preserves integrity of thermally labile molecules (e.g., antioxidants, vitamins).
Tunable Solvation Power	Enables selective targeting of specific compound classes (e.g., lipids, carotenoids) by adjusting pressure.
No Solvent Residues	Produces clean, solvent-free extracts suitable for pharmaceuticals and food.
Reduced Energy Consumption	Lower operating costs and environmental footprint compared to distillation-based separation.
Non-Flammable and Non-Toxic	Enhances process safety and reduces environmental impact.

Despite its benefits, limitations exist. The low solubility for highly polar compounds can necessitate the use of co-solvents [2]. Additionally, the high initial capital investment and costs associated with recycling COâ‚‚ remain barriers to widespread implementation [2].

Quantitative Data and Operating Parameters

The effective application of scCOâ‚‚ requires careful optimization of operational parameters to maximize yield and selectivity. The following table summarizes typical operating conditions for extracting different classes of bioactive compounds, demonstrating the tunability of the process.

Table 2: Representative Operating Parameters for SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction of Bioactives

Target Bioactive / Matrix	Pressure (bar)	Temperature (°C)	Co-solvent & Flow Rate	Key Outcomes
Lipids from Starfish Meal [3]	275	45	Ethanol, 1-3 mL/min	Effective extraction of marine phospholipids.
General Biomass Compounds [2]	Variable: 100-500	Variable: 40-80	Ethanol, Methanol (as needed)	Selective isolation of high-value compounds; high purity extracts.
Decaffeination of Coffee [1]	Not Specified	Not Specified	Water (sprayed after extraction)	Removal of caffeine without adulterating coffee constituents.
Essential Oils from Herbs [1]	Not Specified	Lower than steam distillation	None typically	Separation of plant waxes from oils; lower temperature than steam.

The density of scCOâ‚‚, and hence its solvating power, can be dramatically altered with small changes in temperature and pressure, especially near the critical point [4]. This phenomenon allows researchers to tailor the solvent strength for a specific application. Furthermore, the addition of moderate polar co-solvents like ethanol or methanol is a common strategy to improve the solubility of more polar bioactive molecules, thereby expanding the range of compounds that can be effectively extracted [2] [3].

Detailed Experimental Protocol

This protocol provides a detailed methodology for the extraction of bioactive lipids from marine biomass (starfish meal) using scCOâ‚‚ with ethanol as a co-solvent, as derived from published work [3]. It can be adapted for other biomass types with appropriate parameter optimization.

Title: Supercritical COâ‚‚ Extraction of Bioactive Lipids from Marine Biomass Objective: To extract lipid-based bioactive compounds from dried, powdered starfish meal using a supercritical fluid extraction system with a co-solvent.

Materials and Equipment

• Supercritical Fluid Extractor: MV-10 ASFE System (Waters) or equivalent, equipped with a high-pressure pump, cooling heat exchanger, temperature-controlled oven, and collection vessel.
• Extraction Vessel: 25 mL capacity.
• Carbon Dioxide (COâ‚‚): Food-grade, purity ≥ 99.995%.
• Co-solvent: HPLC grade Ethanol (EtOH).
• Biomass Sample: Dried starfish meal, ground to a particle size of <1 mm.
• Analytical Balance.
• Nitrogen Evaporation System.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Sample Preparation: Weigh 13.0 g of dried starfish meal powder. Pack the powder uniformly into the 25 mL extraction vessel. Avoid creating channels to ensure even COâ‚‚ flow.
• System Assembly: Connect the packed extraction vessel to the scCOâ‚‚ inlet line and the extract outlet line. Place the vessel into the system oven.
• Parameter Setting: Set the extraction parameters on the control unit:
  • Extraction Pressure: 275 bar
  • Extraction Temperature: 45 °C
  • COâ‚‚ Flow Rate: 5 mL/min
  • Co-solvent (EtOH) Flow Rate: 1 mL/min or 3 mL/min (as per experimental design)
• Static Extraction: Initiate the COâ‚‚ and co-solvent flow. Once the system reaches the set pressure and temperature, begin a static extraction phase for 10 minutes. This allows the solvent mixture to penetrate and solubilize the target compounds within the biomass matrix.
• Dynamic Extraction: After the static period, commence the dynamic extraction for 70 minutes. During this phase, the scCOâ‚‚-EtOH mixture continuously flows through the sample, carrying the dissolved lipids out of the vessel and into the collection trap.
• System Rinsing: Stop the co-solvent flow. Continue flowing pure scCOâ‚‚ at the same rate (5 mL/min) for an additional 10 minutes. This step ensures that all remaining solvent and extracted material are purged from the vessel and transfer lines.
• Depressurization and Collection: Gradually depressurize the system. Collect the crude extract from the collection vessel.
• Solvent Removal: Place the extract in a suitable tube and evaporate any residual ethanol under a gentle stream of nitrogen gas.
• Storage: Weigh the final extract and store it at -20 °C in an airtight container until further analysis.

Workflow and System Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow and the key components of a typical supercritical COâ‚‚ extraction system configured for use with a co-solvent.

SC-CO2 Extraction Workflow

A schematic representation of the key components in a scCOâ‚‚ extraction system with co-solvent capability is provided below.

SC-CO2 System Schematic

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

The successful implementation of scCOâ‚‚ extraction protocols relies on a set of key reagents and materials. The following table details these essential components and their functions within the experimental framework.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction

Item Name	Function/Application	Critical Specifications
Supercritical CO₂	Primary extraction solvent; tunable solvating power.	High-purity grade (≥99.995%); free of moisture and hydrocarbons.
Ethanol (Co-solvent)	Modifies polarity of scCOâ‚‚; enhances solubility of polar bioactives (e.g., phospholipids, phenolics).	HPLC grade; anhydrous.
Methanol (Co-solvent)	Alternative polar co-solvent for challenging extractions.	HPLC grade; highly toxic, requires careful handling.
Solid Biomass	Source of target bioactive compounds.	Dried and finely comminuted (<1 mm particle size) to maximize surface area.
Nitrogen Gas	Gentle removal of residual solvents from the final extract post-collection.	High-purity, dry grade.
3-(Dimethylamino)propoxy Benziodarone	3-(Dimethylamino)propoxy Benziodarone, CAS:1346604-30-5, MF:C22H23I2NO4, MW:619.238	Chemical Reagent
Desoxycarbadox-D3	Desoxycarbadox-D3, CAS:1448350-02-4, MF:C11H10N4O2, MW:233.24 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (SC-CO2) has emerged as a transformative technology in pharmaceutical research and development, offering a sustainable and efficient alternative to conventional organic solvents. SC-CO2 is obtained by pressurizing carbon dioxide above its critical point (73.8 bar, 31.1°C), creating a state with unique properties between a gas and a liquid [5]. This supercritical state confers exceptional solvent capabilities while aligning with the principles of green chemistry, making it particularly valuable for extracting bioactive compounds, engineering drug particles, and developing advanced formulations.

For researchers and drug development professionals, SC-CO2 technology addresses multiple challenges simultaneously: it eliminates toxic solvent residues from final products, preserves the integrity of thermolabile bioactive molecules, and reduces environmental impact through solvent-free processes and CO2 recycling [5] [2]. The technology's tunable physicochemical properties enable unprecedented selectivity and precision in pharmaceutical manufacturing, supporting the industry's transition toward more sustainable and innovative therapeutic development.

Core Advantages: Quantitative Benefits for Pharmaceutical Applications

Supercritical CO2 offers a multifaceted advantage profile that spans environmental, economic, and product quality dimensions. These benefits are particularly relevant to pharmaceutical applications where purity, efficacy, and safety are paramount.

Environmental and Safety Advantages

• Green Solvent Profile: SC-CO2 is non-toxic, non-flammable, and chemically inert, significantly improving workplace safety and eliminating the health risks associated with conventional petroleum-based solvents like hexane [5]. As a recovered co-product from industrial processes, its use supports circular economy principles in pharmaceutical manufacturing [5].

• Waste Reduction: The technology produces no toxic effluent or solvent waste, eliminating the substantial disposal costs and environmental burdens associated with traditional solvent extraction methods [5]. This aligns with increasingly stringent global regulations on industrial solvent use [6].

• Resource Efficiency: SC-CO2 processes demonstrate reduced energy and resource consumption compared to conventional methods, particularly through CO2 recycling loops integrated into modern systems [5]. Life cycle assessment studies indicate that optimized SC-CO2 processes can achieve lower environmental impacts across multiple categories, with global warming potentials ranging from 0.2 to 153 kg CO2eq/kg input depending on the specific application and scale [7].

Product Quality Advantages

• Preservation of Bioactive Compounds: The low-temperature processing conditions (typically 31-60°C) prevent thermal degradation of sensitive pharmaceutical compounds, preserving molecule integrity and biological activity [5] [2]. Research on lipid and carotenoid extraction from oleaginous yeasts demonstrates that SC-CO2 better preserves unsaturated lipids and oxygen-sensitive carotenoids compared to conventional organic solvents [8].

• Superior Extract Purity: SC-CO2 leaves no solvent residues in the final product, eliminating a critical contamination risk and simplifying downstream purification processes [5] [6]. The resulting extracts are free from the toxic residues associated with solvents like hexane, ethanol, ethyl acetate, or acetone [5].

• Selectivity and Tunability: By modulating extraction parameters (pressure, temperature, density, and co-solvents), researchers can precisely target specific compound classes based on their chemical properties [5] [2]. This selectivity enables the production of standardized extracts with consistent bioactive profiles, crucial for pharmaceutical quality control.

Process Economics and Efficiency

• Reduced Operating Costs: The low cost of CO2, combined with recycling capabilities and reduced process times, contributes to favorable economics despite potentially higher initial capital investment [5]. The technology's efficiency often translates to higher yields of valuable compounds compared to conventional methods [8] [9].

• Versatility and Integration: SC-CO2 technology supports multiple processing functions including extraction, impregnation, particle formation (SAS, PGSS, RESS), formulation, and sterilization within a single platform [5]. This multifunctionality enables complex pharmaceutical manufacturing workflows with minimal material transfer between steps.

Table 1: Quantitative Advantages of SC-CO2 in Pharmaceutical Processing

Advantage Category	Key Metric	Comparison to Conventional Methods	Pharmaceutical Impact
Environmental Impact	Global Warming Potential	27 of 70 LCA studies show lower impacts [7]	Reduced carbon footprint & regulatory compliance
Solvent Consumption	Organic Solvent Use	Eliminates hexane, ethanol, chloroform [5] [8]	No toxic residues in APIs
Product Quality	Thermal Degradation	Processing at 31-60°C vs. 60-100°C [5]	Preserved bioactivity of thermolabile compounds
Extraction Efficiency	Carotenoid Yield	332.09 μg/g DW vs. 19.9 μg/g DW [8]	Higher recovery of valuable bioactives
Process Selectivity	Tunable Parameters	Pressure, temperature, density, co-solvents [5] [2]	Targeted compound isolation

Advanced Applications in Pharmaceutical Research and Development

Enhanced Bioactive Compound Recovery

SC-CO2 extraction has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in recovering high-value bioactive compounds from natural sources. In a recent study on hemp seed oil extraction, SC-CO2 modified with 10% ethanol significantly enhanced the recovery of phenolic compounds, achieving a total phenolic content of 294.15 GAE mg/kg oil—a substantial improvement over conventional methods [9]. The extracted oil contained 26 identified phenolic compounds, with N-trans-caffeoyltyramine (50.32 mg/kg oil), cannabisin A (13.72 mg/kg oil), and cannabisin B (16.11 mg/kg oil) as the most abundant constituents [9].

The integration of ethanol as a polar co-solvent addresses the inherent limitation of pure SC-CO2 in dissolving highly polar compounds, thereby expanding the technology's applicability to a broader spectrum of pharmaceutical compounds while maintaining its green chemistry profile [9].

Particle Engineering and Drug Delivery Systems

SC-CO2 technology enables advanced particle engineering through techniques such as Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions (RESS), Supercritical Antisolvent (SAS), and Particles from Gas-Saturated Solutions (PGSS) [10]. These approaches allow precise control over particle size, morphology, and crystallinity—critical parameters for drug bioavailability and performance.

For poorly soluble drugs (BCS Class II and IV), SC-CO2 processes can enhance dissolution rates and bioavailability through particle size reduction and amorphization [11]. The technology supports the development of advanced drug delivery systems including microparticles, nanoparticles, and solid lipid nanoparticles with tailored release profiles [11].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Protocol: SC-CO2 Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Materials

This standardized protocol describes the optimization of SC-CO2 extraction parameters for enhanced recovery of bioactive compounds from plant matrices, applicable to various pharmaceutical research applications.

Materials and Equipment

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Equipment

Category	Item/Specification	Function/Application
Supercritical Fluid System	Extraction vessel, CO2 pump, back-pressure regulator, co-solvent pump, separator	Core extraction infrastructure
CO2 Source	Food-grade or research-grade carbon dioxide (≥99.9% purity)	Primary extraction solvent
Co-solvents	Ethanol (96-99.9%, food or pharmaceutical grade)	Enhance polarity and compound range
Raw Material Preparation	Freeze dryer, mill/grinder, sieves (100-500 μm)	Particle size standardization
Analysis Equipment	HPLC-DAD/ESI-MS2, GC-FID/MS, spectrophotometer	Compound identification and quantification

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Raw Material Preparation:

  • Lyophilize plant material to moisture content <10%
  • Mill or grind to consistent particle size (250-500 μm)
  • Determine initial moisture content and chemical composition

• SC-CO2 System Setup:

  • Pre-equilibrate system to desired temperature (40-60°C)
  • Load extraction vessel with raw material (typically 5-100g depending on vessel size)
  • Ensure all connections are properly sealed and pressure-rated

• Extraction Parameter Optimization:

  • Apply experimental design (e.g., Box-Behnken) varying:
    • Pressure (150-350 bar)
    • Temperature (40-70°C)
    • Extraction time (120-300 min)
    • Co-solvent percentage (0-15% ethanol)
  • Maintain constant CO2 flow rate (e.g., 10-25 g/min)

• Process Execution:

  • Pressurize system slowly to target pressure
  • Maintain conditions until completion of dynamic extraction
  • Collect extract in separator upon depressurization
  • Record yield gravimetrically

• Extract Analysis:

  • Analyze for target compounds via HPLC, GC, or spectrophotometric methods
  • Determine oxidative stability index (OSI) if applicable
  • Assess quality parameters (peroxide value, conjugated dienes)

• Data Analysis:

  • Model results using response surface methodology
  • Identify optimal conditions for maximum yield/quality
  • Validate model with confirmatory experiments

Protocol: Machine Learning-Assisted Solubility Prediction for Drug Formulation

This protocol leverages machine learning to predict drug solubility in SC-CO2, significantly reducing experimental requirements for pharmaceutical process development.

Data Collection and Preprocessing

• Compile Experimental Dataset:

  • Collect drug solubility data across varied conditions (temperature, pressure)
  • Include molecular descriptors (Tc, Pc, acentric factor, MW, melting point)
  • Ensure data quality through outlier detection and validation

• Feature Selection:

  • Select critical input parameters: temperature (T), pressure (P), critical temperature (Tc), critical pressure (Pc), density (ρ), acentric factor (ω), molecular weight (MW), and melting point (Tm) [10]
  • Normalize features to standard scales

Model Development and Training

• Algorithm Selection:

  • Implement ensemble methods: XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, Random Forest
  • Compare performance using k-fold cross-validation

• Hyperparameter Optimization:

  • Utilize bio-inspired optimization algorithms (APO, HOA)
  • Minimize objective function (RMSE, MAE)

• Model Validation:

  • Assess using statistical metrics (R², RMSE, AARD)
  • Define applicability domain using William's plot
  • Perform sensitivity analysis (SHAP, FAST)

Implementation for Pharmaceutical Development

• Solubility Prediction:

  • Input drug properties and process conditions
  • Generate solubility predictions across operational ranges
  • Identify optimal processing windows

• Process Design:

  • Apply predictions to guide experimental design
  • Optimize SC-CO2 processes for specific drug compounds
  • Reduce experimental burden by >70% compared to traditional approaches [10]

Visualization of SC-CO2 Pharmaceutical Applications

SC-CO2 Pharmaceutical Application Workflow

Implementation Guide: The Scientist's Toolkit

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Critical Reagents and Materials for SC-CO2 Pharmaceutical Research

Reagent/Material	Specification	Research Function	Application Notes
Carbon Dioxide	Research grade (99.99%) with dip tube	Primary supercritical solvent	Higher purity reduces extraction interference
Pharmaceutical-Grade Ethanol	≥99.9% purity, low water content	Polar co-solvent	Enhances extraction of phenolic compounds
Reference Standards	Certified reference materials (CRMs)	Compound identification and quantification	Essential for method validation and QC
Derivatization Reagents	BSTFA, MSTFA, etc.	GC analysis of extracted compounds	Enables analysis of non-volatile compounds
Antioxidant Additives	BHT, ascorbic acid, tocopherols	Prevent oxidative degradation	Critical for oxygen-sensitive compounds
Stationary Phases	C18, silica, cyano, amino	Fractionation and purification	Enables compound-class separation
Isopropyl dodec-11-enylfluorophosphonate	Isopropyl dodec-11-enylfluorophosphonate, MF:C15H30FO2P, MW:292.37 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
trans-2-Nonenal-D4	trans-2-Nonenal-D4|CAS 221681-22-7|Stable Isotope		Bench Chemicals

Technology Integration and Scale-Up Considerations

Successful implementation of SC-CO2 technology requires careful consideration of scaling parameters from laboratory to production. Laboratory-scale systems (100mL to 2L) are ideal for method development and initial optimization, while production-scale systems (2x5L to 2x100L) enable manufacturing-scale production [5]. When scaling processes, researchers should consider:

• Mass Transfer Optimization: Laboratory results may require adjustment for larger extraction vessels where diffusion paths lengthen
• CO2 Recycling Systems: Essential for economic and environmental sustainability at production scale
• Integrated Fractionation: Multi-separator configurations enable continuous fractionation of complex extracts
• Process Analytical Technology (PAT): Implement real-time monitoring for critical quality attributes in GMP environments

Supercritical CO2 technology represents a paradigm shift in pharmaceutical processing, offering an unparalleled combination of environmental sustainability, product quality enhancement, and process efficiency. As the industry faces increasing pressure to adopt greener technologies while maintaining cost-effectiveness and product excellence, SC-CO2 emerges as a versatile platform capable of meeting these competing demands.

The integration of machine learning approaches with SC-CO2 processes further strengthens its position as a next-generation pharmaceutical technology, enabling predictive modeling and optimization that dramatically reduces development timelines and experimental costs [10] [12] [11]. As research continues to expand the applications of SC-CO2 in drug discovery, formulation, and manufacturing, this technology is poised to become an indispensable tool for innovative pharmaceutical companies committed to sustainability, efficacy, and safety.

For research institutions and pharmaceutical companies investing in future capabilities, SC-CO2 technology offers not only immediate process improvements but also a platform for developing novel therapeutic formulations and delivery systems that would be impossible with conventional solvent-based approaches.

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction has emerged as a powerful and environmentally friendly technology for isolating bioactive compounds from natural plant materials. This technique leverages CO2 above its critical point (31.1°C and 73.8 bar), where it exhibits unique properties intermediate between a gas and a liquid, enabling efficient penetration of biological matrices and selective dissolution of target compounds [13] [14]. The tunable solvent power of SC-CO2 by adjusting pressure and temperature, combined with its non-toxic, non-flammable, and easily separable properties, makes it particularly advantageous for producing high-purity extracts for pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and cosmetic applications [2] [15]. This application note details the key bioactive compound classes efficiently extracted using SC-CO2 technology, providing structured quantitative data and detailed experimental protocols for researchers and drug development professionals.

Key Bioactive Compound Classes Extractable via SC-CO2

The selectivity of SC-CO2 extraction allows for the targeted isolation of various valuable bioactive compounds. The following table summarizes the major compound classes, their sources, and representative applications.

Table 1: Key Bioactive Compound Classes Extracted by SC-CO2

Compound Class	Representative Examples	Plant Sources	Primary Applications
Terpenoids	Monoterpenoids (Geraniol), Sesquiterpenoids (Parthenolide), Diterpenoids (Cafestol) [14]	Spearmint, German Chamomile [14] [16]	Aromatherapy, fragrances, traditional remedies [14]
Phenolic Compounds	Flavonoids, Cinnamic acids, Coumarins, Lignans [14]	Rheum tataricum roots, Spearmint leaves [17] [14]	Antioxidants, reduction of coronary heart disease and cancer risk [14]
Fatty Acids & Lipids	Triglycerides, Free Fatty Acids, Phytosterols (e.g., in Pumpkin seed oil) [14] [18]	Borage, Primrose, Pumpkin seeds, Winter melon seeds [14] [18]	Nutraceuticals, biofuels, quality control of oils [14]
Essential Oils	Volatile aromatic compounds [16]	Spices (Cinnamon, Cardamom, Clove) [16]	Food flavoring, perfumery, aromatherapy

The extraction efficiency and selectivity for these compounds are highly dependent on process parameters. For instance, SC-CO2 is inherently non-polar, making it excellent for extracting lipophilic compounds like terpenoids and fatty acids. The solubility of polar compounds like certain phenolics can be significantly enhanced by adding a polar co-solvent, such as ethanol [13].

Comparative Quantitative Performance of SC-CO2

The superiority of SC-CO2 over conventional extraction methods is demonstrated through quantitative comparisons of yield and bioactive content.

Table 2: Comparative Extraction Performance: SC-CO2 vs. Conventional Methods

Plant Material	Extraction Method	Key Performance Metric	Result	Reference
Various Seeds (Pumpkin, Flax, Linden, etc.)	SC-CO2	Oil Yield	Preferred method for 4 out of 6 plant materials, especially seeds with lower oil content [18]	[18]
	Hexane Extraction	Oil Yield	Efficient but leaves toxic solvent residues [18]	[18]
	Cold Pressing	Oil Yield	Suboptimal, yields between 10-25% [18]	[18]
Pumpkin Seeds	SC-CO2	Phytosterol Content	Improved total phytosterol content [18]	[18]
Coreopsis tinctoria Nutt.	SC-CO2 (Optimized)	Oleoresin Yield	3.163% yield under optimal conditions (27.5 MPa, 45°C, 3 h) [19]	[19]
German Chamomile	SC-CO2	Chemical Profile	Extracts more closely resemble the flower's original chemical makeup (green color) vs. steam-distilled (blue color) [16]	[16]

Detailed Experimental Protocol for SC-CO2 Extraction

The following section outlines a standard protocol for the SC-CO2 extraction of bioactive compounds from solid plant matrices.

Research Reagent Solutions & Essential Materials

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for SC-CO2 Extraction

Item	Function/Application	Notes
Liquid CO2 Supply	Primary solvent for extraction.	Food-grade purity is recommended for producing consumable extracts [13].
Co-solvents (e.g., Ethanol)	Modifier to increase polarity of SC-CO2 and enhance extraction yield of polar compounds.	Ethanol is a common, food-grade, and safe choice [13].
Raw Plant Material	Source of bioactive compounds.	Must be dried and ground to increase surface area [14].
Sodium Sulphate / Silica Gel	Drying agents to control moisture content of plant material.	High moisture reduces yield and causes mechanical issues [14].

Step-by-Step Workflow

Step 1: Sample Preparation The plant material should be dried to a low moisture content (typically below 10%) to prevent ice formation and efficiency reduction during extraction [14]. The dried material is then ground to a consistent particle size (e.g., 0.2-0.5 mm) to increase the surface area for contact with SC-CO2 while avoiding overly fine powder that can impede fluid flow [14].

Step 2: System Pressurization and Heating CO2 gas from a storage tank is cooled, compressed, and heated to bring it to supercritical conditions. The system must stabilize at the desired temperature and pressure above the critical point (e.g., 31.1°C and 73.8 bar) [15] [14].

Step 3: Loading the Extraction Vessel The prepared plant material is loaded into a high-pressure extraction vessel, which is then sealed to withstand the operational pressures [15].

Step 4: Extraction (Solubilization) The supercritical CO2 is pumped through the extraction vessel. Target compounds are dissolved from the plant matrix and carried out of the vessel. This can be done in static (soaking) or dynamic (continuous flow) modes [13]. Key optimized parameters include:

• Pressure: Typically 100-400 bar. Higher pressure increases CO2 density and solvating power, improving yield for many compounds [14] [19].
• Temperature: Usually 35-60°C. Temperature has a complex effect, influencing both solvent density and solute vapor pressure [19] [14].
• CO2 Flow Rate: Optimized to ensure sufficient contact time (e.g., 20 L/h in a lab-scale system) [19].
• Co-solvent: If needed, 1-15% of a co-solvent like ethanol can be added to the CO2 stream to enhance polarity [13].

Step 5: Separation and Collection The CO2-rich stream containing the dissolved solutes passes into a separator where pressure is reduced, and/or temperature is changed. This drop in solvating power causes the extracted compounds to precipitate for collection [13] [15]. Fractional separation can be achieved using multiple separators in series set to different conditions [13].

Step 6: CO2 Recycling The now-gaseous CO2 is condensed back into a liquid, cleaned if necessary, and recycled back to the storage tank, making the process cost-effective and sustainable [15].

Below is a workflow diagram summarizing the SC-CO2 extraction process.

Compound-Specific Optimization Strategies

Achieving high yield and purity requires tailoring SC-CO2 parameters to the target compound class. The following diagram illustrates the strategic decision-making process for optimizing the extraction of different bioactives.

SC-CO2 extraction is a versatile and powerful green technology for obtaining a broad spectrum of high-value bioactive compounds from plant matrices. Its principal advantages include the tunable selectivity of the solvent, the avoidance of toxic solvent residues, and the preservation of thermolabile compounds due to low operational temperatures [13] [2]. As demonstrated, the successful application of this technique relies on a deep understanding of the target compounds' properties and the careful optimization of critical process parameters such as pressure, temperature, and the strategic use of co-solvents. This application note provides a foundational guide for researchers in drug development and related fields to harness SC-CO2 extraction for producing superior, potent, and pure natural extracts.

Historical Context and Technological Evolution in Extraction

Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction has established itself as a cornerstone technology for obtaining bioactive compounds from natural sources. This technique leverages carbon dioxide above its critical point (31.1°C and 1071 psi), where it exhibits unique gas-like diffusivity and liquid-like solvating power, enabling highly selective and efficient extraction [20]. The evolution of this technology represents a significant paradigm shift from conventional solvent-based methods, moving the extraction industry toward greener, more sustainable practices while meeting the stringent purity requirements of the pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic industries [2] [21]. This article frames the historical development and technological advancements of SC-CO2 extraction within the broader context of bioactive compound research, providing detailed application notes and experimental protocols for the research community.

Historical Development and Technological Trajectory

The foundation of supercritical fluid extraction dates to the 19th century, but its significant industrial adoption began in the late 20th century, driven by the need for cleaner, more selective extraction techniques. Early applications focused primarily on decaffeination of coffee and extraction of hops in the brewing industry, demonstrating the technology's viability for heat-sensitive compounds [21]. These initial successes paved the way for broader applications across multiple sectors.

The historical evolution of SC-CO2 extraction has been characterized by several key transitions: from macro-scale extraction to micro-scale selective isolation; from standalone systems to integrated biorefinery concepts; and from empirical approaches to precisely controlled, modeled processes. This trajectory has been supported by parallel advancements in high-pressure equipment design, process monitoring capabilities, and computational modeling tools [22].

Table 1: Historical Evolution of Key SC-CO2 Extraction Applications

Time Period	Industrial Applications	Technological Focus	Key Bioactives Targeted
1970s-1980s	Coffee decaffeination, hop extraction	Establishing basic process parameters, equipment design	Caffeine, hop bitter acids
1990s-2000s	Spice extraction, essential oils	Selectivity enhancement, scale-up	Essential oils, oleoresins, flavors
2000s-2010s	Nutraceuticals, herbal extracts	Polar compound recovery with co-solvents	Antioxidants, carotenoids, phytosterols
2010s-Present	Pharmaceutical intermediates, waste valorization	Process intensification, integration with biorefineries	High-value pharmaceuticals, functional ingredients from byproducts

Fundamental Principles and Mechanism

Supercritical CO2 exists when both temperature and pressure are elevated beyond its critical point (31.1°C, 1071 psi), creating a state with properties intermediate between gases and liquids [20]. This unique state gives SC-CO2 several advantageous characteristics as an extraction solvent: liquid-like density that enables solvating power, gas-like viscosity and diffusivity that promote deep penetration into solid matrices, and zero surface tension that facilitates complete contact with the substrate [2] [20].

The extraction mechanism follows a sequential mass transfer process: (1) penetration of SC-CO2 into the solid plant matrix, (2) solvation of target compounds from the matrix, (3) diffusion of the solute-solvent complex out of the matrix, and (4) separation of the extract by depressurization [23]. The solvating power of SC-CO2 is highly tunable and strongly dependent on temperature and pressure conditions, allowing researchers to selectively target specific compound classes through parameter manipulation [2] [21].

Figure 1: SC-CO2 Extraction Mechanism. The process transforms CO2 into its supercritical state before penetrating biomass, solubilizing targets, and separating extracts through depressurization with solvent recycling.

Technological Parameters and Optimization Methodologies

The efficiency and selectivity of SC-CO2 extraction are governed by three fundamental parameters that can be precisely controlled and optimized: temperature, pressure, and flow rate. Understanding the interplay between these parameters is essential for method development and optimization.

Pressure significantly influences SC-CO2 density, with higher pressures (typically 110-250 bar) increasing solvent density and thus solvating power, particularly for higher molecular weight compounds [23]. Research on carotenoid extraction from pumpkin flesh demonstrated that pressure increases led to significant improvements in chlorophyll, carotenoid content, and antioxidant activity of extracts [24]. Similarly, studies on hemp seed oil extraction found pressure to be the most significant parameter affecting oil yield, with linear effect coefficients of 3.679 in regression models [9].

Temperature affects both the vapor pressure of solutes and the density of SC-CO2, creating a complex relationship with extraction efficiency. In Chlorella vulgaris extraction, temperature increases from 40°C to 60°C at constant pressure (180 bar) remarkably increased yield but degraded phenolic, chlorophyll, and selected carotenoid content, suggesting co-extraction of less bioactive substances at higher temperatures [23]. This demonstrates the importance of temperature optimization balanced between yield and extract quality.

Flow rate determines the contact time between solvent and matrix, with higher flow rates (20-40 g/min) typically increasing extraction rates by maintaining a higher concentration gradient, though excessively high flows may reduce extraction efficiency [23]. The solvent-to-feed ratio is also an important consideration for process economics.

Table 2: Optimized SC-CO2 Parameters for Selected Bioactive Compounds

Source Material	Target Compound	Optimal Pressure (bar)	Optimal Temperature (°C)	Optimal Flow Rate	Extraction Yield
Hemp Seed [9]	Oil, Phenolic Compounds	200	50	0.25 kg/h	30.13% (with 10% ethanol)
Chlorella vulgaris [23]	Carotenoids, Antioxidants	250	60	40 g/min	3.37% w/w
Pumpkin Flesh [24]	Carotenoids (β-carotene, lutein)	250-400	40-60	Not specified	81.3 mg/100 g d.m.

Advanced Optimization Approaches

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with Box-Behnken designs has emerged as a powerful statistical approach for SC-CO2 optimization. In hemp seed oil extraction, RSM models with R² values of 0.94-0.99 successfully predicted the effects of temperature, pressure, and time on oil yield, total phenolic content, tocopherols, and oxidative stability [9]. These models revealed significant linear effects for all variables, with pressure-temperature interactions particularly impactful on yield.

Mass transfer-based kinetic models, such as Sovová's model, have been successfully applied to describe extraction curves for microalgae and plant materials, helping researchers identify diffusion-controlled regimes and optimize process parameters [23]. These modeling approaches reduce experimental burden while providing fundamental understanding of mass transfer limitations.

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Standardized Protocol for SC-CO2 Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Materials

Principle: This protocol describes the optimization and execution of SC-CO2 extraction for recovering bioactive compounds from solid plant matrices, using hemp seed extraction as a representative model [9].

Materials and Equipment:

• Supercritical CO2 extraction system with co-solvent capability
• CO2 source (food-grade or higher purity)
• Raw plant material (e.g., hemp seeds, pumpkin flesh, microalgae)
• Grinding apparatus (mill or grinder)
• Sieve set (100-1000 μm)
• Analytical balance (±0.0001 g)
• Co-solvent (e.g., food-grade ethanol)

Sample Preparation:

• Raw Material Pretreatment: For high-moisture materials (>10% water content), implement appropriate drying. Freeze-drying is preferred for heat-sensitive compounds; vacuum oven drying at 40-60°C is acceptable for more stable compounds [24].
• Particle Size Reduction: Grind material to 500 μm using an appropriate mill. Sieve to ensure uniform particle size distribution [9].
• Matrix Preparation: For difficult-to-extract compounds, consider adding a co-matrix (e.g., pumpkin seeds for carotenoid extraction) to improve recovery [24].

Extraction Procedure:

• System Preparation: Weigh 10-50 g of prepared biomass and load into extraction vessel. Ensure proper packing to avoid channeling.
• Parameter Setting: Based on preliminary screening or statistical design, set temperature (30-60°C), pressure (10-20 MPa), and CO2 flow rate (0.25 kg/h or 20-40 g/min) [9] [23].
• Dynamic Extraction: Initiate CO2 flow and maintain conditions for predetermined time (120-300 min). For co-solvent experiments, introduce ethanol (2.5-20% of CO2 flow rate) after system stabilization [9].
• Separation and Collection: Depressurize effluent through a separation vessel maintained at lower pressure (5-6 MPa) and temperature (15-25°C) to collect the extract.
• CO2 Recycling: Optional recycling of CO2 through a condenser and pump for improved process economics.

Optimization Approach:

• Screening Design: Implement a Plackett-Burman or fractional factorial design to identify significant factors.
• Response Surface Methodology: Apply Box-Behnken or Central Composite Design to model parameter interactions.
• Validation: Confirm optimal conditions with triplicate experiments and validate model predictions.

Co-solvent Modification Protocol for Enhanced Polar Compound Recovery

Principle: This protocol details the use of ethanol as a co-solvent to improve extraction efficiency of polar bioactive compounds that have limited solubility in pure SC-CO2 [9] [21].

Materials:

• Anhydrous ethanol (food-grade or higher purity)
• SC-CO2 extraction system with co-solvent delivery capability
• Standard extraction materials as in Protocol 5.1

Procedure:

• Establish Baseline: Conduct extraction with pure SC-CO2 at optimal parameters determined through preliminary experiments.
• Co-solvent Addition: Introduce ethanol at 2.5-20% (w/w) of CO2 flow rate using a high-pressure pump. For hemp seed oil, 10% ethanol demonstrated optimal enhancement of phenolic compounds without affecting fatty acid profiles [9].
• Equilibration: Allow system to stabilize for 15-20 minutes after co-solvent introduction.
• Extended Extraction: Continue extraction for the predetermined time, typically 240-300 minutes.
• Extract Collection: Collect extract in amber vials to protect light-sensitive compounds and store at -20°C until analysis.

Applications: This protocol is particularly effective for increasing yield of polyphenols, tannins, and more polar carotenoids (lutein, astaxanthin) that have limited solubility in pure SC-CO2 [23] [21].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for SC-CO2 Extraction

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Technical Considerations
Supercritical CO2	Primary extraction solvent	Critical point: 31.1°C, 1071 psi; non-toxic, non-flammable, recyclable [20]
Ethanol	Polar co-solvent	Increases polarity of SC-CO2; enhances extraction of phenolic compounds; food-grade preferred [9] [21]
Plant Matrix/ Biomass	Source of bioactive compounds	Requires drying (<10% moisture) and grinding (500 μm) for optimal extraction [24] [9]
Pumpkin Seeds	Co-matrix for carotenoid extraction	Improves recovery of lipophilic compounds from pumpkin flesh when used as inert matrix [24]
Olive Oil	Alternative co-solvent/ entrainer	Natural, food-safe entrainer for sensitive compounds; used in carotenoid extraction [24]
DAz-2	DAz-2, MF:C9H13N3O2, MW:195.22 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Methyl 2-[1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1h-indole-3-carboxamido]-3,3-dimethylbutanoate	MDMB-FUBICA|Synthetic Cannabinoid|Analytical Standard	MDMB-FUBICA high-purity analytical standard. For forensic and research use only (RUO). Supports cannabinoid receptor agonist studies and toxicology.

Analytical Workflow and Method Integration

A comprehensive analytical workflow is essential for evaluating SC-CO2 extraction efficiency and extract quality. The integration of proper analytical techniques provides critical feedback for process optimization.

Figure 2: Integrated SC-CO2 Research Workflow. The process encompasses sample preparation, extraction optimization, comprehensive analytical characterization, and data analysis to refine parameters.

Yield Determination: Gravimetric measurement after solvent removal provides the fundamental extraction yield, typically expressed as % w/w of dry starting material [23].

Bioactive Compound Quantification:

• Total Phenolic Content (TPC): Folin-Ciocalteu method with gallic acid equivalents [9] [23]
• Carotenoid Profile: HPLC-DAD with C30 columns for separation of lutein, β-carotene, and astaxanthin [24] [23]
• Tocopherols: HPLC with fluorescence detection for vitamin E active compounds [9]

Advanced Analytical Techniques:

• HPLC-DAD/ESI-MS2: For comprehensive phenolic profiling and compound identification, as demonstrated in hemp seed oil analysis that identified 26 phenolic compounds including N-trans-caffeoyltyramine and cannabisins A and B [9]
• Antioxidant Activity Assays: DPPH radical scavenging, ORAC, or TEAC methods to quantify functional antioxidant capacity [23]
• Oxidative Stability Index (OSI): Accelerated oxidation test to predict shelf-life and functionality [9]

Current Research Trends and Future Perspectives

The SC-CO2 extraction field continues to evolve with several emerging trends shaping its future applications in bioactive compound research. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning for predictive modeling and process optimization represents the next frontier in extraction technology [22]. These approaches can potentially reduce development time and improve extraction selectivity through advanced pattern recognition.

The concept of green biorefineries utilizing SC-CO2 as a core technology for complete biomass valorization is gaining significant traction [2]. This approach aligns with circular economy principles by transforming agricultural byproducts into multiple value-added streams, with SC-CO2 extraction serving as the initial step for lipophilic compound recovery.

Process intensification through equipment design improvements, including dynamic pressure modulation, advanced co-solvent delivery systems, and corrosion-resistant alloys, is addressing current limitations in scalability and operational costs [22]. The development of continuous extraction systems alongside traditional batch configurations offers potential for improved throughput in industrial applications [22].

The application spectrum of SC-CO2 extraction continues to expand into new domains, including biomedical materials processing, impregnation of polymers with bioactive compounds, and extraction of high-value compounds from marine resources and industrial side streams [2]. These emerging applications demonstrate the versatility and continuing relevance of SC-CO2 technology in advancing sustainable extraction processes for bioactive compounds across multiple research and industrial sectors.

Strategic Methodologies and Industrial Applications in Drug Discovery

System Components and Process Flow of a Standard SFE Setup

Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE), particularly using carbon dioxide (SC-COâ‚‚), has emerged as a green and efficient technology for the extraction of bioactive compounds from plant biomass and food by-products [2]. Within the broader context of research on supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of bioactives, understanding the core components and their interplay is fundamental to optimizing processes for the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries. This application note provides a detailed overview of a standard SFE system's architecture, supported by quantitative data and practical protocols for researchers and drug development professionals.

System Components and Function

A standard industrial SFE system consists of several key subunits that work in concert to achieve efficient extraction. The configuration ensures a continuous, closed-loop process where COâ‚‚ is recycled, enhancing both economic and environmental feasibility [25].

Table 1: Core Components of an Industrial SFE System

System Component	Function	Key Operational Considerations
COâ‚‚ Supply Tank	Stores the liquid COâ‚‚ feedstock.	Requires high-purity (e.g., 99%) food or pharmaceutical-grade COâ‚‚ to prevent contamination [26].
Metering / High-Pressure Pump	Pressurizes the liquid COâ‚‚ to the desired supercritical state.	Must generate pressures typically ranging from 150 to 350 bar for laboratory scales and up to 300-400 bar for industrial systems [26] [25].
Heat Exchanger	Heats the pressurized CO₂ to the extraction temperature.	Brings CO₂ above its critical temperature of 31 °C; industrial systems often operate between 35-80 °C [27] [26].
Extraction Vessel	Holds the raw material for processing.	Vessels are high-pressure cylinders; sample pre-treatment (e.g., grinding to ~1.8 mm) and packing are critical to avoid channeling [26].
Pressure Relief Valve	Reduces the pressure post-extraction.	Facilitates the separation of the extract from the SC-COâ‚‚ by lowering its solvating power [28].
Separation Vessel	Collects the extracted bioactives.	The drop in pressure causes the COâ‚‚ to revert to a gaseous state, releasing the solute [25].
COâ‚‚ Condenser & Recycle System	Reliquefies the gaseous COâ‚‚ for reuse.	Improves the economic viability and sustainability of the process by reducing solvent consumption [2].

Process Flow Diagram

The following diagram illustrates the logical flow and interaction between the core components of a standard SFE system.

Experimental Protocol: Extraction of Bioactive-Rich Oil from Baru Seeds

This detailed protocol, adapted from a 2021 economic study, outlines the steps for extracting oil from baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds using SFE, with and without pressing assistance [26].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Materials and Reagents

Item	Specification	Function/Rationale
Carbon Dioxide (COâ‚‚)	99% Purity (e.g., White Martins) [26]	Primary supercritical solvent; non-toxic, non-flammable, and cost-effective [25].
Raw Material (Baru Seeds)	Ground, average particle diameter of ~1.8 mm [26]	Optimized particle size increases surface area for extraction while minimizing fluidization and channeling in the bed.
Glass Beads	Inert, diameter to fit extractor vessel	Used to fill the void volume of the extraction vessel not occupied by the sample, ensuring a packed bed and preventing bypass.
Torque Wrench	e.g., Sata ST96303SC [26]	For SFEAP method; applies precise mechanical pressure (e.g., 40 Nm) to seeds within the vessel to augment oil release.
Galactinol dihydrate	Galactinol dihydrate, CAS:1217474-91-3, MF:C12H22O11 · 2H2O, MW:378.3	Chemical Reagent
Cimigenol-3-one	Cimigenol-3-one, MF:C30H46O5, MW:486.7 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Detailed Methodology

Sample Preparation:

• Manually peel and pulp the baru fruits to obtain the seeds.
• Grind the seeds using a laboratory mixer (e.g., Walita Philips Mix) for 80 seconds.
• Determine the average particle diameter using a sieve shaker according to ANSI-ASAE standards [26].
• Store the ground seeds at -20 °C protected from light until extraction.

Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE):

• Load the Extractor: Charge 10 g of ground baru seeds into a 0.1 L high-pressure extraction vessel. Fill any remaining volume with glass beads.
• Set Static/Dynamic Parameters: Program the system for a static extraction time of 5 minutes, followed by a dynamic extraction period.
• Set Process Conditions: Set the extraction temperature to 45 °C and the pressure to 350 bar, which were identified as optimal conditions [26].
• Initiate Extraction: Commence the dynamic flow of SC-COâ‚‚ at a fixed rate. For kinetic studies, collect extract samples at timed intervals over a total extraction period of up to 17 minutes (achieving a solvent-to-feed ratio, S/F, of ~12 g/g).
• Collect Extract: The extract-laden SC-COâ‚‚ is passed through a pressure relief valve into a separation vessel at lower pressure, where the oil precipitates and is collected.
• Calculate Yield: Determine the extraction yield gravimetrically using the formula: ( y(\%) = \frac{m{\text{oil}}}{m{\text{raw material}}} \times 100 ) [26].

Supercritical Fluid Extraction Assisted by Pressing (SFEAP):

• Load and Press: Place 10 g of ground seeds into the extraction vessel. Use the torque wrench to apply a cold-pressing torque of 40 Nm to the sample via a piston.
• Assemble Vessel: Disassemble the pressing system and assemble the extraction vessel into the SFE system.
• Perform SFE: Follow steps 2-6 of the standard SFE protocol above, using identical temperature, pressure, and flow conditions.

Expected Outcomes and Data Analysis

Table 3: Comparative Extraction Data for Baru Seed Oil [26]

Extraction Method	Optimal Conditions	Maximum Yield (g oil/100 g seed)	Key Economic Finding
SFE	350 bar, 45 °C	21.9	Cost of Manufacturing (COM): US $118.32/kg of oil
SFEAP	350 bar, 45 °C, 40 Nm torque	28.6 (~31% higher than SFE)	Cost of Manufacturing (COM): US $87.03/kg of oil

The data demonstrates that the SFEAP method significantly enhances extraction yield and reduces manufacturing costs. The resulting oil is rich in unsaturated fatty acids and terpenic compounds, which are valuable bioactive constituents [26].

This application note delineates the fundamental components and operational workflow of a standard SFE setup, providing a concrete protocol for the extraction of bioactive compounds. The integration of mechanical pressing as a synergistic technique (SFEAP) showcases a significant advancement in the field, leading to higher yields and improved economic feasibility. For researchers in drug development, mastering this system architecture and its variable parameters is a critical step toward leveraging SFE as a sustainable and efficient platform for isolating high-purity bioactive ingredients from diverse natural matrices.

Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction has emerged as a premier green technology for isolating bioactive compounds from natural matrices. The solvating power of SC-CO2 is highly tunable, primarily governed by three critical parameters: pressure, temperature, and flow rate. Within the broader context of bioactive compound research, precise optimization of these parameters is paramount for achieving high extraction efficiency, preserving thermolabile compounds, and ensuring the economic viability of the process for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications [29]. This protocol provides a systematic framework for researchers to optimize these parameters, supported by experimental data and practical methodologies.

The fundamental principle underlying parameter optimization is the control over CO2 density and mass transfer rates. Pressure directly influences CO2 density, thereby affecting its solvating power. Temperature presents a dual effect, simultaneously influencing CO2 density and the vapor pressure of target compounds. Flow rate governs the kinetics of extraction, affecting contact time and the equilibrium between the solid matrix and supercritical fluid [30]. Understanding these interrelationships is crucial for designing efficient extraction protocols for drug development pipelines.

Quantitative Parameter Optimization Data

The following tables consolidate optimized parameters from peer-reviewed studies for various bioactive compounds, providing a reference for experimental design.

Table 1: Optimized Pressure and Temperature Parameters for Select Bioactives

Bioactive Compound	Source Material	Optimal Pressure (bar)	Optimal Temperature (°C)	Key Rationale	Citation
Lavandin Essential Oil	Lavandula hybrida flowers	109 - 112	48 - 49	Maximizes yield of linalool and linalyl acetate.	[31]
Polyprenols	Picea sitchensis needles	200	70	High temperature favored polyprenol yield with ethanol co-solvent.	[32]
Phenolics & Flavonoids	Boesenbergia rotunda rhizome	250	45	Higher temperature negatively impacted TPC and TFC.	[33]
Lycopene	Grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) endocarp	305	70	High pressure and temperature required for non-polar carotenoid.	[34]
Antioxidants & Antimicrobials	Arthrospira platensis (microalgae)	450	60	High pressure and co-solvent crucial for carotenoids and tocopherols.	[35]

Table 2: Optimized Flow Rate and Temporal Parameters for Select Bioactives

Bioactive Compound	Source Material	CO2 Flow Rate	Extraction Time	Notes	Citation
Phenolics & Flavonoids	Boesenbergia rotunda rhizome	3 L/min	30 min	Higher flow rate increased yield; time set based on preliminary data.	[33]
Lycopene	Grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) endocarp	35 g/min	135 min	Combined with high pressure for exhaustive extraction.	[34]
Antioxidants & Antimicrobials	Arthrospira platensis	Not Specified	25 min (Dynamic)	Preceded by 15 min static time for equilibration.	[35]
General Guidance	Plant Materials	0.5 - 10 L/min	2 - 4 hours	Yield typically plateaus after this period.	[30]

Experimental Protocol: Systematic Optimization of SFE Parameters

Research Reagent Solutions and Essential Materials

Table 3: Essential Materials and Reagents for SFE Optimization

Item	Function/Application	Example & Specification
Supercritical CO2 Extractor	Core system for performing extractions.	Equipped with a CO2 pump, heated extraction vessel, back-pressure regulator, and separator.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)	Primary extraction solvent.	Industrial grade (≥ 99.5% purity).
Co-solvent	Modifies polarity of SC-CO2 to enhance solubility of polar compounds.	Anhydrous Ethanol (HPLC grade).
Plant Material	Source of target bioactive compounds.	Dried, ground, and sieved to uniform particle size (e.g., 0.3-0.85 mm).
Internal Standards	For quantitative GC or HPLC analysis.	e.g., n-Hexanol for GC-FID [31].
Analytical Standards	For calibration and compound identification.	Pure compounds of the target bioactive (e.g., pinostrobin, pinocembrin [33]).

Methodological Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for optimizing SFE parameters, from preparation to analysis.

Step-by-Step Procedure

Step 1: Raw Material Preparation

• Drying: Dry the plant material at a low temperature (e.g., 40°C) to a moisture content of 5-10% to prevent ice formation and minimize co-extraction of water-soluble compounds [31] [30].
• Communication: Grind the dried material and sieve it to a uniform particle size. A range of 0.3 mm to 0.85 mm is often optimal. Too fine a powder can cause channeling and system clogging, while large particles reduce mass transfer [31] [34] [30].

Step 2: Preliminary Parameter Screening

• Objective: Identify which parameters (pressure, temperature, flow rate, co-solvent percentage, static/dynamic time) have a significant effect on the extraction yield.
• Design: Employ a screening design like Plackett-Burman [35]. This design efficiently evaluates multiple factors with a minimal number of experimental runs.
• Example: As demonstrated for Arthrospira platensis, a Plackett-Burman design can identify co-solvent (ethanol) flow rate as the most significant factor for extracting antioxidants and antimicrobials, followed by pressure and temperature [35].

Step 3: In-Depth Optimization via Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

• Objective: Find the optimal level of each significant parameter and understand their interactive effects.
• Design: Use a Central Composite Design (CCD) or Box-Behnken Design (BBD). These RSM designs generate a polynomial model that predicts yield based on the parameters [31] [33] [34].
• Execution:
  • Load the extraction vessel with a known mass of prepared plant material (e.g., 20-40 g), often mixed with an inert dispersant like glass beads to improve flow dynamics [31] [35].
  • Set the co-solvent (e.g., ethanol). It can be pre-mixed with the sample [33] or delivered via a separate pump [32].
  • Pressurize and heat the system to the target conditions. Allow for a static extraction period (e.g., 5-15 minutes) to allow the solvent to penetrate the matrix and solubilize the target compounds [31] [35].
  • Initiate the dynamic extraction by starting the CO2 flow for the specified duration. Collect the extract in a trap containing a solvent like ethanol or via depressurization into a collection vessel [31] [33].
  • Weigh the extract to determine the yield and proceed with quantitative analysis (e.g., HPLC, GC).

Step 4: Model Validation and Analysis

• Validation: Conduct confirmation experiments at the predicted optimal conditions to validate the accuracy of the RSM model.
• Analysis: Quantify the target bioactive compounds in the extracts. For example:
  • Use GC-FID with an internal standard (e.g., n-hexanol) to quantify 1,8-Cineole, linalool, linalyl acetate, and camphor in lavandin [31].
  • Use HPLC to quantify specific compounds like pinostrobin and pinocembrin in fingerroot extracts [33] or lycopene in grapefruit [34].

Discussion of Parameter Interactions and Advanced Strategies

The Interplay of Pressure and Temperature

The optimization of pressure and temperature is not independent. Their interaction can be complex, as they both influence the density of the supercritical CO2. For instance, in the extraction of lycopene from grapefruit, a combination of high pressure (305 bar) and high temperature (70°C) was optimal [34]. Conversely, for total phenolic content (TPC) in fingerroot, high pressure (250 bar) was beneficial, but a lower temperature (45°C) was required to prevent degradation of these more polar, thermolabile compounds [33]. This highlights the need for a compound-specific optimization strategy.

Static-Dynamic vs. Semi-Continuous Modes

The extraction steps can be configured for higher efficiency. A study on lavandin demonstrated that a Static-Dynamic Steps (SDS) procedure, which cycles between static and short dynamic phases, achieved a similar yield (4.768%) to a conventional semi-continuous method but with an 81.56% reduction in solvent consumption [31]. This approach enhances contact time and equilibrium attainment, making the process more sustainable and cost-effective without sacrificing yield.

The Role of Co-solvents

For medium to high-polarity compounds, the addition of a co-solvent like ethanol is often essential. It dramatically increases the solubility of target bioactives. For example, a study on seaweed showed that just 5% ethanol in CO2 provided high selectivity for β-carotene while minimizing the co-extraction of unwanted carbohydrates, proteins, and arsenic [36]. Higher water and ethanol content may be needed for more polar compounds but can reduce selectivity [36].

Within the paradigm of green chemistry, Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE), particularly using carbon dioxide (SC-COâ‚‚), has emerged as a premier technique for the isolation of bioactive compounds from plant matrices [37]. This case study delves into the application of SC-COâ‚‚ for extracting flavonoids from medicinal plants, using Ampelopsis grossedentata as a primary model. Flavonoids, a major class of plant-derived polyphenols, are sought after for their potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and chemopreventive properties [38] [39]. The objective is to provide a detailed application note and protocol framework, situating the discussion within broader thesis research on the optimization and scalability of SC-COâ‚‚ for bioactive compounds, tailored for an audience of researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals.

Background and Principles

Flavonoids as Key Bioactive Targets

Flavonoids are secondary metabolites with a characteristic C6-C3-C6 flavone skeleton, comprising two benzene rings linked by a heterocyclic pyrene ring [38]. Their health benefits, including antioxidative activities through free radical scavenging and metal ion chelation, make them significant targets for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical development [39]. The selectivity of any extraction process is highly dependent on the specific flavonoid subclasses present—such as flavones, flavonols, flavanones, and anthocyanins—and their respective polarities [40] [39].

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide as a Green Solvent

SC-CO₂ leverages carbon dioxide at temperatures and pressures above its critical point (31.1 °C, 73.8 bar), where it exhibits unique solvating power [37]. Its gas-like diffusivity and liquid-like density allow for superior penetration into plant matrices and tunable selectivity by manipulating pressure and temperature. The primary advantage of SC-CO₂ is its environmental benignity; CO₂ is non-toxic, non-flammable, and easily removed from the extract, yielding a solvent-free product [37]. Furthermore, the moderate critical temperature helps prevent the thermal degradation of labile flavonoids [41] [42]. A key limitation of pure SC-CO₂ is its inherent non-polarity, which is overcome by adding a polar modifier, typically ethanol or methanol, to enhance the extraction efficiency of medium- to high-polarity flavonoids [42] [43].

Case Study: SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction fromAmpelopsis grossedentataStems

Optimization of Extraction Parameters

An orthogonal array design (L₉ (3⁴)) was employed to optimize the SC-CO₂ extraction of total flavonoid content (TFC) and total phenolic content (TPC) from A. grossedentata stems [41] [42]. The influence of four parameters—pressure, temperature, dynamic extraction time, and modifier composition—was investigated. The optimal conditions and the relative significance of each parameter are summarized below.

Table 1: Optimal SC-COâ‚‚ Conditions for Bioactive Compound Extraction from A. grossedentata Stems [41] [42]

Parameter	Optimal for Flavonoids	Optimal for Phenolics	Influence on TFC (in order of significance)	Influence on TPC (in order of significance)
Pressure	250 bar	250 bar	Pressure > Dynamic Time > Temperature > Modifier	Temperature > Pressure > Dynamic Time > Modifier
Temperature	40 °C	40 °C
Dynamic Time	50 min	50 min
Modifier	Methanol/Ethanol (1:3, v/v)	Methanol/Ethanol (1:1, v/v)

The following table details the specific effects of each parameter on the extraction yield, providing quantitative insights for process optimization.

Table 2: Effect of Extraction Parameters on Yield from A. grossedentata [41] [42]

Parameter	Condition Range	Observed Effect on TFC and TPC
Pressure	150 - 250 bar	Both TFC and TPC increased with pressure, attributed to higher COâ‚‚ density and solvating power.
Temperature	40 - 60 °C	Both TFC and TPC decreased with increasing temperature, indicating CO₂ density reduction was the dominant effect.
Dynamic Time	30 - 70 min	TFC and TPC increased markedly from 30 to 50 min, with only a slight, non-significant increase from 50 to 70 min.
Modifier	MeOH/EtOH (3:1 to 1:3, v/v)	The modifier had a selective effect. A 1:3 (v/v) MeOH/EtOH mixture was optimal for TFC, while a 1:1 mixture was best for TPC.

Under these optimized conditions, the extract yielded 4.67 mg of flavonoids per gram of dry material and demonstrated significant antioxidant activity, with a DPPH radical scavenging effect of up to 95.87% for the most active extract [42]. HPLC analysis revealed the presence of specific flavonoids, including apigenin, vitexin, and luteolin, which were previously unreported in the stems of this plant [41] [42].

Experimental Protocol: SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction of Flavonoids

This protocol is optimized for the extraction of flavonoids from dried plant stems, such as those of A. grossedentata.

I. Sample Preparation

• Drying: Dry the plant stems in an oven at a low temperature (e.g., 40-45 °C) until a constant weight is achieved to prevent enzymatic degradation [39].
• Grinding: Grind the dried material to a fine powder using a high-speed pulverizer. A particle size smaller than 0.5 mm is recommended for optimal surface contact [39].
• Defatting (Optional): For cleaner flavonoid profiling, defat the powdered material by soaking it in a non-polar solvent like petroleum ether (e.g., 7.5 mL/g for 24 h), followed by vacuum filtration and subsequent drying [44] [39].

II. Supercritical COâ‚‚ Extraction Setup

• Equipment: Ensure the SFE system is equipped with a COâ‚‚ pump, a co-solvent pump, a pressurized extraction vessel, temperature-controlled ovens, and a back-pressure regulator.
• Modifier Preparation: Prepare the modifier solution. For general flavonoid extraction, a mixture of methanol and ethanol (1:3, v/v) is effective. For a greener profile, pure ethanol can be tested as an alternative [42].

III. Extraction Procedure

• Loading: Accurately weigh a defined mass (e.g., 5-10 g) of the prepared plant powder into the extraction vessel.
• System Pressurization and Heating: Set the extraction vessel to the desired temperature (e.g., 40 °C). Pressurize the system with COâ‚‚ to the target pressure (e.g., 250 bar).
• Dynamic Extraction: Initiate the flow of COâ‚‚ and the modifier. A typical COâ‚‚ flow rate is 2 L/min, with a modifier flow rate of 0.5 mL/min [42]. Commence the dynamic extraction for the optimized time (e.g., 50 min).
• Collection: The extract, containing the dissolved flavonoids, is collected from the separator outlet into a suitable container by reducing the pressure.
• Sample Handling: Evaporate any residual solvent from the collected extract under a gentle stream of nitrogen or by rotary evaporation. Reconstitute the extract in a known volume of methanol or ethanol for subsequent analysis and store at -20 °C.

The workflow for this protocol is summarized in the following diagram:

Comparative Analysis with Other Green Extraction Techniques

While SC-COâ‚‚ is highly effective, other green extraction techniques are also employed for flavonoids. The choice of technique depends on the target compounds, cost, and equipment availability.

Table 3: Comparison of Green Extraction Techniques for Flavonoids [38] [40]

Technique	Key Principle	Optimal Solvent/ Conditions	Advantages	Disadvantages / Selectivity
Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE)	Uses supercritical CO₂ as a tunable solvent.	CO₂ with 10-30% EtOH modifier; 250 bar, 40°C [42] [43].	Low environmental impact, solvent-free extracts, low thermal degradation, high selectivity.	High capital cost; selectivity is tuned via P, T, and modifier.
Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE)	Acoustic cavitation disrupts cell walls.	Ethanol-water (40-60%); 30-80°C; 30-65 min [44] [38].	Rapid, high efficiency, simple equipment, scalable.	High selectivity for flavonols (e.g., quercetin) and flavones [40].
Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE)	Microwave energy causes rapid heating.	Polar solvents like water or ethanol.	Very fast, low solvent consumption.	Can degrade thermolabile compounds; requires optimized power and time.
Subcritical Water Extraction (SWE)	Uses water at high T and P below critical point.	Water at 100-180°C.	Solvent is water; high extraction power.	Suitable for polar flavonoids; can hydrolyze glycosides at high T [40].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 4: Key Reagents and Materials for SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction of Flavonoids

Item	Function / Application	Notes for Researchers
Carbon Dioxide (CO₂)	The primary supercritical solvent.	Food-grade, high-purity (≥ 99.9%) is essential to prevent contamination [37].
Ethanol (Absolute)	Polar modifier for SC-COâ‚‚.	Increases polarity of SC-COâ‚‚ to solubilize medium-polarity flavonoids; preferred over methanol for "green" and non-toxic profiles [42] [43].
Methanol (HPLC Grade)	Alternative modifier; solvent for extract analysis.	Highly effective but more toxic than ethanol; used for HPLC mobile phase and sample preparation [42].
Aluminum Nitrate	Colorimetric assay reagent.	Used in the complexation reaction for the quantification of total flavonoid content (as rutin equivalents) [44].
Rutin Standard	Analytical standard for calibration.	Used to generate a standard curve for the quantitative determination of total flavonoids [44].
DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl)	Free radical for antioxidant activity assay.	Evaluates the free radical scavenging activity of the flavonoid extracts [41] [42].
Petroleum Ether	Non-polar solvent for defatting.	Used in sample preparation to remove lipophilic compounds (fats, waxes, chlorophyll) before flavonoid extraction [44] [39].
ABC34	ABC34, CAS:1831135-56-8, MF:C31H33N5O6, MW:571.634	Chemical Reagent
Taccalonolide B	Taccalonolide B, CAS:108885-69-4, MF:C34H44O13, MW:660.7 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Analysis and Detection of Flavonoid Extracts

Accurate analysis is critical for characterizing SC-COâ‚‚ extracts. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) coupled with various detectors is the gold standard.

• HPLC with Photodiode Array (PDA) Detection: This is the most common method for separation, identification, and quantification of individual flavonoids in a complex extract [40] [45]. It separates compounds based on their interaction with the stationary and mobile phases, with detection typically between 250-350 nm, where flavonoids have strong UV absorption [45].
• Antioxidant Activity Assays: The biological potential of extracts is often evaluated using chemical antioxidant assays.
  • DPPH Assay: Measures the extract's ability to scavenge the stable DPPH free radical, indicated by a color change [42]. For A. grossedentata extracts, a strong correlation was found between flavonoid/phenolic content and DPPH scavenging activity [42].
  • Ferrous Ion Chelating (FIC) Assay: Measures the ability of the extract to chelate ferrous ions, which are pro-oxidants [41]. Notably, in A. grossedentata, flavonoids and phenolics were not the primary contributors to this activity, highlighting the importance of multiple assay types [41].

The logical relationship between the major stages of flavonoid research, from extraction to bioactivity validation, is outlined below.

This case study demonstrates that SC-COâ‚‚ is a highly efficient and selective technology for the extraction of flavonoids from medicinal plants like Ampelopsis grossedentata. The optimization of parameters such as pressure, temperature, and modifier composition is crucial for maximizing yield and tailoring the extract profile. The obtained extracts are rich in valuable flavonoids and exhibit significant antioxidant activity, underscoring their potential for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications.

Future research in this field, particularly within a thesis framework, should focus on:

• Sequential Extraction Strategies: Integrating SC-COâ‚‚ with other techniques (e.g., SC-COâ‚‚ for non-polar compounds followed by UAE for polar flavonoids) for comprehensive biomass valorization [37].
• Scalability and Techno-Economic Analysis: Bridging the gap between laboratory optimization and industrial implementation by addressing challenges related to equipment cost, process scaling, and economic viability [37].
• Expanding the Compound Library: Applying optimized SC-COâ‚‚ protocols to a wider range of underutilized medicinal plants and food by-products to valorize waste streams and discover novel bioactive flavonoids [37].

Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO₂) extraction has emerged as a green technology for the recovery of lipophilic bioactive compounds from plant matrices. This technique is particularly suited for the extraction of thermo-sensitive molecules like carotenoids, as it operates at moderate temperatures and produces solvent-free extracts of high quality [24]. Carotenoids, such as lycopene and β-carotene, are C40 tetraterpenoid pigments with demonstrated health benefits, including antioxidant, anti-carcinogenic, and cardio-protective activities [46] [47]. However, their extraction is challenging due to their instability and lipophilic nature.

This application note provides a detailed protocol for the SC-COâ‚‚ extraction of lycopene and other carotenoids from plant materials, specifically tomato and grapefruit, within the broader context of bioactive compound research. It is designed for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals seeking to implement a sustainable and efficient extraction methodology.

Key Experimental Data and Optimization Parameters

The efficiency of SC-COâ‚‚ extraction is influenced by several critical parameters. The following tables consolidate optimal conditions and key outcomes from recent studies.

Table 1: Optimized SC-COâ‚‚ Operating Parameters for Lycopene Extraction from Different Plant Matrices

Plant Source	Pressure (bar)	Temperature (°C)	CO₂ Flow Rate	Extraction Time (min)	Co-solvent/Modifier	Key Outcome	Reference
Grapefruit	305	70	35 g/min	135	5% Ethanol	Optimized yield via RSM	[34]
Tomato Industrial Waste	300	60	1.44 cm/min (superficial velocity)	N/S	Supercritical Ethane	~90% all-E-lycopene recovery	[48]
Tomato	450	70	13 kg/h	N/S	Camelina Seed Oil (20 w/w%)	Yield: 108.65 g extract/kg ds; Lycopene: 1172 mg/100 g extract	[49]
Tomato (Pomace)	450	66	N/S	N/S	Hazelnut Oil	~60% lycopene recovery	[48]
Tomato	300	55	N/S	N/S	5% Ethanol	54% lycopene recovery	[48]

N/S: Not Specified; RSM: Response Surface Methodology; ds: dried sample

Table 2: Effects of Key Parameters on Lycopene Extraction Yield and Stability

Parameter	Impact on Extraction	Practical Consideration for Lycopene
Temperature	Complex effect: Increases solute volatility and diffusivity but decreases SC-CO₂ density. Can induce isomerization/degradation.	Optimal range typically 55-70°C. Higher temperatures (>80°C) may promote trans to cis isomerization [48] [50].
Pressure	Increases SC-COâ‚‚ density, enhancing solvent power and yield.	Yields increase significantly with pressure, often up to 300-450 bar [48] [49].
Co-solvents/Modifiers	Significantly enhance lycopene solubility in SC-COâ‚‚. Ethanol polarizes COâ‚‚; edible oils act as natural lipophilic solvents.	Ethanol (5-10%) is common. Edible oils (e.g., camelina, tomato seed) are effective, do not require separation, and enhance bioavailability [48] [49].
Particle Size	Smaller particles increase surface area, improving extraction kinetics.	Finer powders (<0.2-0.5 mm) generally yield more lycopene [50].
Moisture Content	High water content hinders extraction of lipophilic compounds.	Pre-dehydration (e.g., freeze-drying) is essential for high-moisture matrices [24] [50].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Sample Preparation Protocol: Freeze-Drying and Grinding

Objective: To stabilize the plant matrix and standardize particle size for efficient SC-COâ‚‚ extraction.

Materials and Reagents:

• Fresh, ripe plant material (e.g., tomatoes, grapefruit)
• Liquid Nitrogen (for rapid freezing, optional)
• LDPE zip-lock bags

Equipment:

• Freeze-dryer (e.g., FD8512S, ilShin Europe)
• Knife mill or grinder (e.g., GM200, Retsch)
• Sieve (250 μm mesh)

Procedure:

• Preparation: Wash and dry the fresh fruits. For grapefruit, peel and dice the endocarp. For tomatoes, remove stems and dice.
• Freezing: Place the diced material on freeze-dryer trays. For best preservation of thermolabile compounds, snap-freeze using liquid nitrogen or set the freeze-dryer to a deep-freeze cycle (e.g., -52°C).
• Lyophilization: Lyophilize the samples until a stable, dry weight is achieved (e.g., for 4 days at -52°C under dark conditions) [34] [51].
• Grinding and Sieving: Transfer the lyophilized material to a knife mill and grind to a fine powder. Pass the powder through a 250 μm sieve to ensure a uniform particle size.
• Storage: Pack the powdered sample in LDPE zip-lock bags. Store at -20°C in the dark to prevent oxidation and degradation of carotenoids prior to extraction.

SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction Protocol for Lycopene

Objective: To extract lycopene and other carotenoids from a freeze-dried plant matrix using supercritical COâ‚‚ with a co-solvent.

Materials and Reagents:

• Freeze-dried plant powder (100 g)
• Liquid COâ‚‚ (purity ≥ 99.5%)
• Food-grade Ethanol (96.6%)
• Seed oil (e.g., Camelina, Hemp, or Tomato seed oil) - if used as a modifier

Equipment:

• Supercritical COâ‚‚ Extraction System (e.g., Thar Technologies, USA Model 7100)
• High-pressure extraction vessel
• Amber glass vials for collection
• Analytical balance

Procedure:

• System Preparation: Ensure the SFE system is clean and calibrated. Set the co-solvent pump for a 5% (v/v) ethanol addition if applicable.
• Loading: Weigh 100 g of the freeze-dried powder. If using a solid modifier (e.g., seed powder), mix it uniformly with the plant matrix at the desired ratio (e.g., 20 w/w%) [49]. Load the mixture into the extraction vessel, ensuring a uniform pack to avoid channeling.
• Parameter Setting: Program the extraction software with the optimized parameters. For a generic, high-yield lycopene extraction, the following can serve as a starting point:
  • Pressure: 300 - 450 bar
  • Temperature: 60 - 70 °C
  • COâ‚‚ Flow Rate: 13 - 35 g/min
  • Extraction Time: 135 - 180 min
  • Co-solvent: 5% Ethanol or equivalent modifier [34] [49].
• Extraction: Start the extraction process. The system will pressurize and heat to the set points. The SC-COâ‚‚ will pass through the matrix, solubilizing the carotenoids.
• Collection: The extract, containing dissolved carotenoids and co-solvent, is depressurized and collected in amber vials to protect from light.
• Post-Processing: The collected extract can be vacuum-dried to remove any trace moisture or volatile components. Weigh the final extract to determine the yield.
• Storage: Store the extract at -20°C in the dark until analysis.

Analytical Quantification Protocol: Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC)

Objective: To quantify the lycopene content in the SC-COâ‚‚ extract.

Materials and Reagents:

• SC-COâ‚‚ extract
• Lycopene standard (e.g., from Sigma-Aldrich)
• Hexane (HPLC grade)
• Methanol (UPC2/MS grade)

Equipment:

• Ultra-Performance Convergence Chromatography System (e.g., UPC² Acquity System, Waters)
• BEH 2-EP column (2.1 x 150 mm, 5 μm)
• Photodiode Array (PDA) Detector
• PVDF membrane syringe filter (0.22 μm)

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: Dissolve a known weight of the vacuum-dried extract in hexane. Filter the solution through a 0.22 μm PVDF membrane into a 1.5 mL amber vial [34].
• SFC Conditions:
  • Mobile Phase: COâ‚‚ and Methanol (85:15, v/v), run under isocratic conditions.
  • Column Temperature: Maintain constant as per column specifications.
  • Detection: Set the PDA detector to 452 nm for lycopene [34].
• Calibration: Prepare a series of standard solutions of pure lycopene in hexane and run them under the same SFC conditions to create a calibration curve.
• Analysis: Inject the sample and quantify the lycopene concentration by comparing the peak area to the calibration curve.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials and Reagents for SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction of Carotenoids

Item	Function/Application in Protocol	Example & Specification
Supercritical Fluid Extractor	Core system for performing the extraction under high pressure and temperature.	Thar Technologies SFE System (e.g., Model 7100); must handle pressures up to 450-500 bar.
Freeze-Dryer	Sample preparation; removes water to create a stable, porous matrix for efficient SC-CO₂ diffusion.	ilShin FD8512S or equivalent; capable of reaching -50°C or lower.
Analytical SFC/UPC2 System	Quantification of target carotenoids (e.g., lycopene) in the extract.	Waters UPC² Acquity System with PDA detector.
BEH 2-EP Column	Stationary phase for the chromatographic separation of carotenoid isomers.	Waters BEH 2-EP column (2.1 x 150 mm, 5 μm).
Food-Grade Ethanol	Polar co-solvent; modifies the polarity of SC-COâ‚‚, significantly improving lycopene solubility and yield.	96-99% purity, devoid of denaturants.
Edible Seed Oils	Natural, lipophilic modifiers; act as an internal co-solvent and can be part of the final product.	Camelina, Hemp, or Tomato Seed Oil with high PUFA content [49].
Lycopene Standard	External standard for the identification and quantification of lycopene via chromatography.	Sigma-Aldrich, ≥90% purity.
RO495	RO495, MF:C17H14Cl2N6O, MW:389.2 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Suc-Ala-Glu-Pro-Phe-Pna	Suc-Ala-Glu-Pro-Phe-Pna, MF:C32H38N6O11, MW:682.7 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Workflow and Pathway Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the complete experimental workflow for the SC-COâ‚‚ extraction and analysis of lycopene from plant sources.

Within the framework of advanced research on the supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) extraction of bioactives, achieving high selectivity for target compounds is a paramount objective. While scCO2 is an exceptional solvent for non-polar molecules, its efficacy diminishes for more polar bioactive substances, such as many polyphenols. This technical application note addresses this limitation by examining the strategic use of co-solvents, with a particular focus on ethanol, to modulate the solvation power of scCO2. As a green, tunable, and highly selective method, ethanol-modified scCO2 extraction is enabling researchers in drug development and allied fields to recover a broader spectrum of high-purity, thermally sensitive bioactive compounds from complex plant and algal matrices.

The Mechanistic Basis of Co-Solvent Enhancement

The incorporation of a co-solvent, a process also known as modifier addition, fundamentally alters the physicochemical properties of the supercritical fluid. Supercritical CO2, while excellent for lipophilic compounds, possesses minimal solubility for polar molecules due to its non-polar nature [9] [52]. A polar co-solvent like ethanol acts as a molecular mediator in this system.

The enhancement mechanism operates on several levels:

• Solvation Power Alteration: The co-solvent molecules cluster around solute molecules and interact strongly via hydrogen bonding and dipole-dipole forces, effectively increasing the overall polarity of the supercritical fluid mixture. This significantly boosts the solubility of polar bioactive compounds that would otherwise be insoluble in pure scCO2 [21].
• Selectivity Tuning: By carefully selecting the type and concentration of the co-solvent, the process can be fine-tuned for specific compound classes. For instance, ethanol preferentially solubilizes phenolic compounds, tocopherols, and water-soluble vitamins, thereby increasing the selectivity of the extraction process for these valuable bioactives [21].
• Matrix Interaction: The co-solvent can swell the plant matrix, improving the penetrative ability of scCO2 and facilitating the desorption of target compounds from the internal structure of the biomass, thereby enhancing overall mass transfer and extraction efficiency [21].

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for selecting and incorporating a co-solvent into an scCO2 process to enhance selectivity.

The effect of ethanol modification is not merely qualitative; it produces quantifiable enhancements in yield and bioactive content. The following table synthesizes experimental data from recent studies on different biomass sources, demonstrating the significant impact of ethanol on key performance metrics.

Table 1: Quantitative Enhancement of scCO2 Extraction with Ethanol Co-Solvent

Biomass Source	Optimal Conditions (P, T, %EtOH)	Key Performance Metrics without EtOH	Key Performance Metrics with Optimal EtOH	Primary Bioactives Enhanced
Hemp Seed [9] [52]	20 MPa, 50°C, 10%	Yield: 28.83 g/100gTPC: Not SpecifiedTotal Tocopherols: Not Specified	Yield: 30.13 g/100gTPC: 294.15 GAE mg/kgTotal Tocopherols: 484.38 mg/kg	Phenolic compounds (e.g., Caffeoyltyramine, Cannabisins), Tocopherols
Muscadine Grape Pomace [53]	20 MPa, 60°C, 15%	TPC: Not Specified (Baseline)	TPC: 2491 mg/100gTFC: 674 mg/100gResveratrol: 1.07 mg/100g	Total Phenolics, Flavonoids, Resveratrol
Gigartina pistillata (Seaweed) [54]	15 MPa, 50°C, 10%	Yield: Lower than conventional solvent	Total Yield: 2.7%(5.66% of conventional solvent yield)	Phenolic Content, Total Carotenoids, PUFA

The data unequivocally shows that ethanol modification consistently improves the extraction of valuable bioactives. For instance, in hemp seed, a 10% ethanol proportion not only increased the oil yield but dramatically enhanced the concentration of antioxidants like tocopherols and phenolics, which are crucial for the oil's oxidative stability and nutraceutical value [9] [52]. Similarly, for polar polyphenols in grape pomace, a higher ethanol concentration of 15% was optimal to achieve high yields of flavonoids and resveratrol [53].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Standard Optimization of scCO2 Extraction with Ethanol Modifier for Hemp Seed Oil

This protocol is adapted from a study that optimized the extraction of bioactive-enriched hemp seed oil using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) [9] [52].

I. Research Reagent Solutions Table 2: Essential Materials and Reagents

Item	Specification / Function
Supercritical Fluid Extractor	High-pressure system equipped with a co-solvent pump, pressure and temperature controls, and a separator.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)	High purity (e.g., ≥ 99.9%), food or pharmaceutical grade.
Anhydrous Ethanol	ACS grade or higher. Serves as the polar modifier to increase solubility of target bioactives.
Raw Material	Hemp seeds (Cannabis sativa L.), crushed and sieved to a uniform particle size (e.g., 500 μm).
Analytical Standards	Standards for target bioactives (e.g., caffeoyltyramine, cannabisins, tocopherols) for HPLC quantification.

II. Procedure

• Feed Preparation: Weigh approximately 100 g of pre-processed hemp seed biomass. Load it into the extraction vessel, ensuring a uniform pack to avoid channeling.
• System Pre-conditioning: Seal the vessel and bring the system to the desired temperature. Pressurize the system with CO2 to the target pressure before initiating the fluid flow.
• Dynamic Extraction with Co-solvent: Start the flow of CO2 at a constant rate (e.g., 0.25 kg/h). Simultaneously, initiate the co-solvent pump to deliver ethanol at the predetermined percentage (e.g., 2.5% to 20% of the CO2 mass flow rate). The mixture of scCO2 and ethanol passes through the biomass for the duration of the extraction (e.g., 244 minutes at optimized conditions).
• Separation and Collection: The solute-laden fluid is passed into a separation vessel where pressure is reduced, causing the CO2 to gasify and separate from the extract. The extract, containing the oil and dissolved bioactives, is collected in the separator.
• Extract Analysis: Weigh the extract to determine yield. Analyze for target bioactive compounds using appropriate analytical techniques (e.g., HPLC-DAD/ESI-MS2 for phenolic profiling, GC for fatty acids, and spectrophotometric methods for TPC and tocopherols) [9] [52].

The following workflow diagram maps this experimental process from preparation to analysis.

Protocol 2: scCO2 Extraction of Polyphenols from Muscadine Grape Pomace

This protocol details the application of ethanol-modified scCO2 for recovering polyphenols from an agricultural byproduct [53].

I. Research Reagent Solutions

• Raw Material: Muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) pomace, dried and ground.
• Co-solvent Mixture: Ethanol-water mixture (50/50, v/v). Water can further increase the polarity of the modifier for highly hydrophilic compounds.
• Other reagents and equipment are similar to Protocol 1.

II. Procedure

• Design of Experiment (DoE): Employ a Central Composite Design (CCD) or Box-Behnken Design (BBD) to optimize three variables: Pressure (20-40 MPa), Temperature (40-60°C), and Cosolvent Concentration (5-15%).
• Extraction Runs: Conduct extractions according to the experimental design matrix. For each run, pack the pomace into the vessel and bring the system to the target conditions.
• Modified Solvent Delivery: Pump the ethanol-water co-solvent (e.g., 15% of total solvent flow) mixed with scCO2 through the biomass for a fixed duration.
• Collection and Analysis: Collect the extract as described in Protocol 1. Key responses to analyze include Total Phenolic Content (TPC), Total Flavonoid Content (TFC), and the yield of specific targets like resveratrol via HPLC. The optimal conditions reported are 20 MPa, 60°C, and 15% co-solvent [53].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Reagents and Equipment for scCO2 Extraction with Co-solvents

Tool Category	Specific Example	Critical Function & Rationale
Primary Solvent	High-Purity CO2 (≥99.9%)	The primary supercritical fluid. Its non-toxicity and low critical temperature make it the industry standard.
Polar Modifier	Anhydrous Ethanol	The most common food-grade co-solvent. Increases the polarity of scCO2, enabling the extraction of medium-to-high polarity bioactives (phenolics, flavonoids) [9] [21].
Binary Modifier	Ethanol-Water (e.g., 50/50 v/v)	Used for extracting highly polar compounds. Water further expands the polarity range of the modifier but requires a system compatible with potential corrosion [53].
Process Optimizer	Response Surface Methodology (RSM)	A statistical technique for modeling and optimizing multiple interactive process parameters (P, T, %co-solvent, time) to maximize yield and selectivity [9] [53].
Analytical Validator	HPLC-DAD/ESI-MS2	The gold-standard for identifying and quantifying specific bioactive compounds in complex extracts (e.g., identifying 26 different phenolics in hemp seed oil) [9] [52].
Isolimonexic acid	Isolimonexic acid, MF:C26H30O10, MW:502.5 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Isookanin	Isookanin, MF:C15H12O6, MW:288.25 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

The strategic deployment of ethanol as a co-solvent in supercritical CO2 extraction represents a sophisticated and powerful tool for enhancing selectivity. By moving beyond pure scCO2, researchers can significantly expand the palette of recoverable bioactive compounds to include valuable polar molecules, all while adhering to the principles of green chemistry. The protocols and data summarized in this application note provide a foundational framework for scientists in drug development and related fields to design and optimize their own extraction processes, paving the way for more efficient and targeted recovery of high-value ingredients from natural sources for pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and cosmetic applications.

Advanced Optimization and Troubleshooting for Maximum Yield and Purity

In the realm of optimizing supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction of bioactive compounds, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) has emerged as a powerful statistical and mathematical framework for developing, improving, and optimizing complex processes. As a collection of statistical techniques for empirical model building, RSM explores the relationships between several explanatory variables and one or more response variables. The primary objective of RSM is to optimize a response influenced by several independent variables through carefully designed experiments. When applied to SC-CO2 extraction, this approach enables researchers to efficiently identify optimal operating conditions for parameters such as pressure, temperature, and extraction time, which significantly impact the yield and quality of target bioactives.

The Central Composite Rotatable Design (CCRD) represents one of the most prevalent experimental designs used within the RSM framework, particularly valued for its efficiency and ability to fit second-order polynomial models. A CCRD consists of three distinct components: a two-level full or fractional factorial design points that estimate linear and interaction effects; center points that provide information about curvature and estimate pure error; and axial (star) points that allow for the estimation of quadratic effects. This arrangement enables the design to cover the experimental space uniformly in all directions, providing approximately the same precision of response prediction for all points equidistant from the design center. The rotatable property ensures that the variance of the predicted response is constant at all points located at the same distance from the center point, which is particularly valuable when exploring the response surface to identify optimal conditions.

The application of RSM with CCRD has demonstrated significant value in SC-CO2 extraction research, where multiple interacting parameters must be simultaneously optimized. This approach has been successfully implemented across diverse biomass sources, including piper nigrum essential oil, propolis, grapefruit lycopene, and peony seed oil, consistently revealing complex interactions between process variables that would be difficult to identify through traditional one-variable-at-a-time experimentation.

Theoretical Framework and Design Principles

Fundamental Statistical Models

The application of RSM in SC-CO2 extraction optimization typically employs a second-order polynomial model to describe the relationship between independent variables and the response. This model can be represented by the following equation [34]:

$$Y = \beta0 + \sum{i=1}^{k}\betaiXi + \sum{i=1}^{k}\beta{ii}Xi^2 + \sum{i=1}^{k}\sum{j>i}^{k}\beta{ij}XiXj + \varepsilon$$

Where Y represents the predicted response, β₀ is the constant coefficient, βᵢ represents the linear coefficients, βᵢᵢ represents the quadratic coefficients, βᵢⱼ represents the interaction coefficients, Xᵢ and Xⱼ are the coded independent variables, and ε is the random error term.

For SC-CO2 extraction processes, this model effectively captures the complex nonlinear relationships between process parameters and extraction outcomes. The coefficients are typically determined through multiple regression analysis using experimental data, with statistical significance assessed through ANOVA (Analysis of Variance). The model's predictive capability is evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²), adjusted R², and prediction R² values, with values greater than 0.9 generally indicating adequate model performance [55] [34].

CCRD Configuration and Design Considerations

The implementation of CCRD for SC-CO2 extraction requires careful consideration of several design parameters. The total number of experiments (N) required in a CCRD with k factors is calculated as N = 2ᵏ + 2k + n₀, where 2ᵏ represents the factorial points, 2k represents the axial points, and n₀ represents the center points. The distance of axial points (α) from the center is determined by α = (2ᵏ)¹/⁴ to maintain rotatability.

For typical SC-CO2 extraction optimization with three key factors (pressure, temperature, and time), this translates to approximately 20 experimental runs (8 factorial points, 6 axial points, and 6 center points). This efficient design provides sufficient degrees of freedom to estimate all main effects, two-factor interactions, and quadratic effects while allowing for lack-of-fit testing and pure error estimation through replicated center points.

Table 1: CCRD Experimental Structure for Three-Factor SC-CO2 Extraction Optimization

Standard Order	Factor A (Pressure)	Factor B (Temperature)	Factor C (Time)	Point Type
1	-1	-1	-1	Factorial
2	+1	-1	-1	Factorial
3	-1	+1	-1	Factorial
4	+1	+1	-1	Factorial
5	-1	-1	+1	Factorial
6	+1	-1	+1	Factorial
7	-1	+1	+1	Factorial
8	+1	+1	+1	Factorial
9	-α	0	0	Axial
10	+α	0	0	Axial
11	0	-α	0	Axial
12	0	+α	0	Axial
13	0	0	-α	Axial
14	0	0	+α	Axial
15-20	0	0	0	Center

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Protocol 1: CCRD Optimization of SC-CO2 Extraction for Bioactive Compounds

This protocol outlines the systematic optimization of SC-CO2 extraction parameters using CCRD, applicable to various biomass sources including plant materials, algae, and herbal formulations [55] [56] [54].

Materials and Equipment

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions and Materials

Item	Specification	Function/Application
CO₂ Source	High purity (≥99.9%)	Primary extraction solvent in supercritical state
Co-solvent	Food-grade ethanol (95-99%)	Modifier for enhancing polarity and extraction efficiency
Biomass Material	Dried, ground to 0.2-1.0 mm particle size	Source of target bioactive compounds
Extraction Vessel	High-pressure, temperature-controlled reactor	Containment for extraction process
Restrictor Valve	Manual or automated back-pressure regulator	Pressure maintenance and flow control
Collection Vessel	Amber glass, cooled	Extract recovery and stabilization

Experimental Procedure

Step 1: Biomass Preparation Commence with biomass drying at 40°C for 24 hours to reduce moisture content below 10%. Precisely grind the material to a consistent particle size between 0.2-1.0 mm using a laboratory grinder, then sieve to ensure uniformity. Store prepared biomass in airtight containers at 4°C until use [57] [34].

Step 2: Experimental Design Implementation Select three to five critical process parameters for optimization based on preliminary screening studies. For SC-CO2 extraction, essential factors typically include pressure (15-40 MPa), temperature (40-80°C), extraction time (40-180 min), CO₂ flow rate (15-35 g/min), and co-solvent concentration (0-15%). Generate the CCRD matrix using statistical software such as Design-Expert, STATGRAPHICS, or R with appropriate α-value for rotatability [55] [34] [54].

Step 3: SC-CO2 Extraction Execution Load the extraction vessel with predetermined biomass quantity (typically 50-100 g), ensuring uniform packing. Pressurize the system to the target pressure while maintaining temperature control within ±1°C. Initiate dynamic extraction by starting CO₂ flow at the specified rate, with or without co-solvent addition. Maintain process parameters strictly according to the experimental design. Collect extracts in amber vessels, preferably with solvent trapping for complete recovery [55] [57] [34].

Step 4: Response Measurement and Analysis Quantify extraction yield gravimetrically after removing residual solvents. Analyze extract composition using appropriate analytical methods (GC-MS, HPLC, SFC) for target bioactive compounds. Record all responses for subsequent statistical analysis [55] [57] [34].

Figure 1: CCRD Optimization Workflow for SC-CO2 Extraction Processes

Protocol 2: Model Validation and Optimization Analysis

This protocol details the statistical analysis of experimental data, model validation, and determination of optimal SC-CO2 extraction conditions.

Statistical Analysis Procedure

Step 1: Model Fitting and ANOVA Input experimental response data into the statistical software. Perform multiple regression analysis to fit the second-order polynomial model. Conduct Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to assess model significance, with p-values <0.05 indicating statistically significant terms. Evaluate model adequacy using lack-of-fit tests (preferably non-significant) and R² values [55] [34].

Step 2: Response Surface Analysis Generate two-dimensional contour plots and three-dimensional response surface plots to visualize factor interactions and identify optimal regions. Analyze the shape and orientation of the contours to understand the nature of factor interactions (synergistic or antagonistic). Identify stationary points and characterize the response surface [55] [58] [34].

Step 3: Optimization and Validation Utilize numerical optimization techniques such as desirability function approach to identify optimal factor settings that simultaneously maximize, minimize, or achieve target values for multiple responses. Confirm model adequacy by conducting verification experiments at predicted optimal conditions and comparing predicted versus actual response values [55] [34].

Applications in SC-CO2 Extraction of Bioactives

Case Studies and Performance Data

The implementation of RSM with CCRD has demonstrated remarkable efficacy across diverse SC-CO2 extraction applications, yielding statistically validated optimal conditions for various bioactive compounds.

Table 3: CCRD-Optimized SC-CO2 Extraction Conditions for Various Bioactives

Bioactive Source	Target Compound	Optimal Conditions	Predicted vs. Actual Yield	Key Significant Factors
Piper nigrum L. [55]	Essential oil	30 MPa, 50°C, 80 min	~2.16% yield	Pressure (p<0.05) most significant
Grapefruit endocarp [34]	Lycopene	305 bar, 70°C, 135 min, 35 g/min CO₂	R² = 0.9885	Pressure, time, and interaction
Propolis [58]	Polyphenols	317 bar, 45°C, 6.5 h	14.3% yield	Pressure and time most significant
Gigartina pistillata [54]	Lipids, phenolics, carotenoids	15-35 MPa, 50-60°C, 5-10% ethanol	2.7% total yield	Pressure and modifier concentration
Rosmarinus officinalis L. [59]	Rosmarinic acid	150 bar, 80°C, 15% ethanol	3.43 mg/g DM	Temperature and co-solvent percentage
Peony seed residue [60]	Residual oil	59.75 MPa, 49.41°C, 1.58 h	6.30% yield	Pressure and temperature

Interpretation of Factor Effects and Interactions

Analysis of multiple SC-CO2 optimization studies reveals consistent patterns in factor significance and interactions. Extraction pressure consistently emerges as the most influential factor across studies, directly affecting COâ‚‚ density and solvating power. Research on Piper nigrum L. essential oil demonstrated pressure as the most significant factor (p<0.05), with yield increasing proportionally with pressure up to 30 MPa [55]. Similarly, pressure showed dominant linear effects in propolis extraction optimization [58].

Temperature exhibits dual effects on extraction efficiency—increasing temperature enhances solute vapor pressure and diffusion rates while simultaneously decreasing CO₂ density, creating a complex interaction that often manifests as a quadratic effect in the model. The interaction between pressure and temperature frequently demonstrates statistical significance, as observed in lycopene extraction from grapefruit, where their combined effect significantly influenced yield [34].

Extraction time typically shows a positive correlation with extraction yield up to a point of diminishing returns, beyond which prolonged extraction provides minimal additional benefit while increasing operational costs and potential degradation risks. For complex matrices like propolis, time emerged as the second most significant factor after pressure [58].

The incorporation of co-solvents such as ethanol significantly enhances the extraction of polar compounds, with modifier concentration showing significant quadratic effects in multiple studies. For rosmarinic acid extraction from rosemary, ethanol concentration at 15% combined with higher temperature (80°C) proved optimal despite the moderate pressure (150 bar) [59].

Figure 2: Factor Effects and Interactions in SC-CO2 Extraction Optimization

The integration of RSM with CCRD provides an efficient, systematic framework for optimizing SC-CO2 extraction parameters, demonstrating consistent success across diverse biomass sources and target compounds. The methodology enables researchers to not only identify optimal operating conditions but also to develop comprehensive mathematical models that describe the complex relationships between process parameters and extraction outcomes. Through the structured experimental approach outlined in these protocols, researchers can significantly reduce development time and resources while achieving enhanced extraction efficiency, yield, and selectivity.

The case studies presented demonstrate the versatility of this approach, from essential oil extraction to recovery of thermolabile bioactive compounds, with consistently high coefficients of determination (R² > 0.985) validating model reliability. The continued advancement of this methodology, particularly through integration with emerging optimization algorithms and multi-objective optimization approaches, holds significant promise for further enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of SC-CO2 extraction processes in pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and cosmetic applications.

Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-COâ‚‚) extraction is widely recognized as an environmentally friendly technology for recovering bioactive compounds from natural matrices, ideal for lipophilic molecules due to the non-polar nature of COâ‚‚ [2] [21]. However, this inherent non-polarity presents a significant challenge for researchers and drug development professionals seeking to extract valuable polar bioactive compounds, such as many phenolic compounds, glycosides, and highly polar antioxidants [21] [14]. The inability of pure SC-COâ‚‚ to effectively solubilize these polar molecules limits the broader application of this green technology in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical development.

Fortunately, several strategic adaptations to the base SFE process have been developed to overcome this solubility barrier. This application note details proven methodologies, including cosolvent modification, sequential extraction frameworks, and integrated hybrid techniques, providing researchers with practical protocols to enhance the recovery of polar bioactives. These strategies align with the principles of green chemistry and support the valorization of agricultural and food by-products within a circular bioeconomy, a key focus of modern extraction research [2] [37].

Core Strategies and Experimental Protocols

Cosolvent Modification of SC-COâ‚‚

The most direct and effective method for increasing the solvent strength of SC-COâ‚‚ towards polar compounds is the addition of a polar cosolvent, also referred to as a modifier. Ethanol, a GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) solvent, is the predominant choice for food and pharmaceutical applications [21] [9]. The modifier increases the polarity of the supercritical phase, improves the swelling of the plant matrix, and enhances the solubility of target polar analytes [21].

Protocol: Optimized Ethanol-Modified SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction of Phenolics from Hemp Seeds [9]

• Objective: To enhance the yield of total phenolics and specific phenolic compounds in hemp seed oil.
• Materials:
  • Plant Material: Hemp seeds (Cannabis sativa L.), ground to a particle size of 500 μm.
  • Extraction Agent: Food-grade COâ‚‚ (99.9% purity).
  • Cosolvent: Absolute ethanol (food grade).
  • Equipment: Supercritical fluid extraction system equipped with a co-solvent pump and a high-pressure extraction vessel.
• Method:
  • Sample Preparation: Load the extraction vessel with a known mass of ground hemp seeds.
  • Baseline SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction: Establish optimal parameters for oil yield using Response Surface Methodology. The identified optimum is 50°C, 20 MPa, for 244 minutes [9].
  • Cosolvent Integration: Under the optimized conditions, introduce ethanol at a proportion of 10% of the total solvent mass. This is achieved by setting the appropriate flow rate for the co-solvent pump relative to the COâ‚‚ pump.
  • Extraction and Collection: Maintain constant pressure and temperature throughout the dynamic extraction time. Collect the extract in a darkened vessel to prevent photodegradation.
  • Analysis: The oil is analyzed for Total Phenolic Content (TPC) using the Folin-Ciocalteu method and for specific phenolic compounds via HPLC-DAD/ESI-MS2.
• Results and Discussion: The addition of 10% ethanol significantly enhanced the extractability of polar phenolics without negatively impacting the oil yield or fatty acid profile. The TPC increased to 294.15 mg GAE/kg, and key polar phenolic compounds like N-trans-caffeoyltyramine were identified and quantified [9]. The following table summarizes the enhancement effect of the ethanol modifier.

Table 1: Enhancement of Bioactive Recovery in Hemp Seed Oil with 10% Ethanol Modifier [9]

Parameter	Pure SC-COâ‚‚	SC-COâ‚‚ + 10% Ethanol	Change
Oil Yield (% fresh weight)	28.83 g/100g	30.13 g/100g	+4.5%
Total Phenolic Content (mg GAE/kg)	Not Reported	294.15	Significant
Total Tocopherols (mg/kg)	Not Reported	484.38	Significant
Oxidative Stability Index (h)	Not Reported	28.01	Improved
Key Polar Compound: N-trans-caffeoyltyramine (mg/kg)	Not Detected	50.32	Recovered

Sequential Extraction and Hybrid Approaches

For plant matrices containing a diverse range of bioactives with varying polarities, a single-step extraction may be insufficient. A sequential extraction strategy or the integration of SFE with other green extraction technologies can maximize the comprehensive recovery of both non-polar and polar fractions [37].

Protocol: Two-Step Enzyme-Assisted Extraction (EAE) Combined with Solid-Liquid Extraction (SLE) for Carob Pulp [61]

• Objective: To selectively recover polar inositols and semi-polar flavonoids from carob pulps.
• Materials:
  • Plant Material: Dried carob pulp (Ceratonia siliqua L.) powder.
  • Enzymes: Commercial cellulases.
  • Solvents: Water and ethanol.
• Method:
  • Enzyme-Assisted Extraction (EAE):
    • Treat the carob pulp powder with cellulase under mild, aqueous conditions (e.g., 45°C, pH optimized for the enzyme).
    • This step hydrolyzes the cell wall matrix, enhancing the release of bound polar compounds like inositols and gallic acid [61].
  • First-Step SLE for Polar Bioactives:
    • Perform SLE on the EAE-treated slurry using pure water at 45°C for 28 minutes.
    • This step maximizes the recovery of the highly polar inositols (e.g., pinitol) and gallic acid.
  • Second-Step SLE for Semi-Polar Bioactives:
    • Subject the residual solid from the first step to a second SLE using 50% aqueous ethanol at 90°C for 42 minutes.
    • This step targets semi-polar flavonoids like kaempferol and luteolin glucosides [61].
• Results and Discussion: This integrated two-step strategy successfully recovered a broad spectrum of bioactives. The first step (EAE + SLE with water) yielded up to 80 mg/g of inositols and 8.4 mg/g of gallic acid. The second step effectively extracted the target flavonoids. This protocol demonstrates how a tailored, multi-stage process can optimize the recovery of compounds with different polarities from a complex matrix.

Protocol: Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE) as a Pretreatment for Sargassum Seaweed [62] [63]

• Objective: To improve the efficiency of subsequent extraction of polar antioxidants and meroterpenoids from seaweed.
• Materials:
  • Plant Material: Dried and ground Sargassum serratifolium or Musa balbisiana peel.
  • Solvent: Methanol or ethanol-water mixtures.
  • Equipment: Microwave-assisted extraction system.
• Method:
  • MAE Pretreatment: The algal or plant material is mixed with a solvent (e.g., 81% ethanol) and subjected to microwave irradiation under optimized conditions (e.g., 44.54 minutes, specific irradiation cycle) [62].
  • Post-Processing: The extract is filtered, and the solvent is removed under reduced pressure.
  • Alternative Pathway: The MAE extract can be used directly, or the pretreated biomass can be further processed using other methods.
• Results and Discussion: A comparative study on Sargassum showed that while SC-COâ‚‚ with ethanol was effective, Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) at 100°C with ethanol provided the highest total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity [63]. This highlights that for some polar matrices, other intensified techniques like MAE or PLE can be more efficient than SFE for polar compounds. MAE of banana peel under optimized conditions yielded a Total Polyphenol Content of 48.82 mg GAE/gDM and a Total Saponin Content of 57.18 mg/gDM [62].

The following diagram illustrates the decision-making workflow for selecting the appropriate strategy based on the target compounds and matrix.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful implementation of the described protocols requires specific reagents and equipment. The following table lists key solutions for developing robust polar bioactive recovery processes.

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for SC-COâ‚‚ of Polar Bioactives

Item	Function & Rationale	Application Notes
Food-Grade COâ‚‚	Primary supercritical fluid solvent. Its non-polar nature is tuned for specific applications.	Purity >99.9% is standard. Non-flammable, non-toxic, and easily separated from the extract [21] [14].
Ethanol (Absolute)	Polar cosolvent (modifier). Increases the polarity of SC-COâ‚‚, enhancing solubility of phenolic compounds, glycosides, and other polar bioactives [9].	GRAS status makes it ideal for food/pharma. Typically used at 5-15% (w/w). Anhydrous grade prevents ice formation in the system.
Commercial Cellulases	Enzyme for matrix pretreatment. Hydrolyzes cellulose in plant cell walls, improving the release of bound intracellular compounds [61].	Use under mild conditions (e.g., 45°C, aqueous buffer). Select enzymes based on matrix composition.
Silica Gel / Sodium Sulfate	Drying agent for sample preparation. Reduces moisture content of the plant matrix prior to SFE [14].	Moisture can cause ice blockages and reduce extraction efficiency of non-aqueous targets. Mix with ground sample before loading.
Dihydroartemisinin	Dihydroartemisinin	High-purity Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) for research. Explore its antimalarial and anticancer mechanisms of action. This product is for Research Use Only (RUO), not for human consumption.

The polarity challenge in supercritical COâ‚‚ extraction is no longer a barrier to the efficient recovery of a wide array of valuable polar bioactive compounds. The strategic application of cosolvents like ethanol, the design of sequential extraction protocols, and the intelligent integration of complementary techniques like EAE and MAE provide a powerful toolkit for researchers. These methods, grounded in the principles of green chemistry, enable the valorization of complex biomass and by-products, supporting advancements in drug development, functional foods, and cosmetics. Future progress will likely focus on further optimizing these hybrid processes and improving their scalability for industrial adoption.

The efficiency of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction in isolating bioactive compounds is profoundly influenced by the physical state of the raw sample material. Sample pre-treatment is not merely a preliminary step but a critical determinant of the entire process's success, impacting yield, selectivity, and kinetic performance. The solvating power of SC-CO2 is highly tunable via pressure and temperature, yet its efficacy is constrained by its low polarity and limited penetration capacity into intact biological matrices. Proper pre-treatment directly addresses these limitations by modifying the solid matrix to facilitate mass transfer. The two most pivotal pre-treatment parameters are moisture content and particle size distribution, as they govern the accessibility of the solvent to the target bioactives and the subsequent diffusion of the solutes into the bulk fluid phase. Within the context of research and drug development, where reproducibility and the recovery of high-purity, thermally sensitive compounds like flavonoids and terpenes are paramount, rigorous standardization of these parameters is non-negotiable [28] [64].

The fundamental principle is to destructure the plant or biomass material to create a high-surface-area, low-diffusion-path-length system without generating excessive fines that can cause channeling or equipment fouling. Furthermore, controlling moisture is essential because water can compete with SC-CO2 for binding sites, alter the matrix's porosity, and in some cases, lead to the hydrolysis of valuable compounds. A comprehensive understanding and systematic control of these variables enable researchers to move from erratic, irreproducible extraction outcomes to a optimized, scalable, and economically viable process [65] [28].

Scientific Rationale and Impact on Extraction Performance

The Role of Particle Size

The size of individual particles defines the diffusion path length that a solute molecule must traverse to reach the solvent and the total surface area available for interaction. Reducing particle size is a primary strategy for enhancing extraction rates and yields. The relationship is governed by Fick's laws of diffusion; a shorter path length allows for more rapid and complete desorption of analytes from the internal pores of the matrix to the external supercritical fluid. Research has consistently shown that smaller particles lead to faster extraction kinetics due to increased surface area and reduced internal mass transfer resistance [65] [28].

However, an important trade-off exists. Excessively fine particles can lead to agglomeration, interlocking, and the formation of dense beds that impede the uniform flow of SC-CO2, causing channeling where the solvent takes the path of least resistance, bypassing significant portions of the sample. This results in incomplete extraction. Fine particles can also complicate the extraction process by increasing dust hazards, causing equipment fouling, and being entrained in the fluid stream. Therefore, the objective of particle size reduction is not to achieve the smallest possible size, but to determine an optimal range that maximizes yield without inducing flow problems [65]. A wide particle size distribution can also promote segregation within the extraction vessel, leading to inconsistent extraction and erratic dosing performance, which is unacceptable in pharmaceutical development [65].

The Role of Moisture Content

Moisture content is a complex variable that can alter the physicochemical properties of the sample matrix and the extraction equilibrium. Its impact is multifaceted. On one hand, the presence of a small amount of moisture can sometimes swell the plant tissue, creating larger pores and facilitating SC-CO2 penetration. On the other hand, high moisture levels are generally detrimental. Water is a polar molecule, while SC-CO2 is a non-polar solvent; thus, moisture can act as a physical barrier, preventing contact between the solvent and the non-polar target compounds like lipids and essential oils [28].

Increased moisture content can significantly reduce extraction efficiency by binding to polar sites on the matrix and reducing the solubility of target compounds in the SC-CO2. Furthermore, high moisture can lead to clumping of the powdered material, effectively recreating the mass transfer barriers that size reduction sought to eliminate. For hygroscopic materials, uncontrolled ambient humidity during storage or pre-treatment can lead to inconsistent starting material, undermining experimental reproducibility. In processes where polar compounds are targeted and co-solvents like ethanol are used, moisture control remains critical to prevent dilution and unpredictable phase behavior [65] [28].

Table 1: Quantitative Impact of Pre-treatment Parameters on SC-CO2 Extraction

Pre-treatment Parameter	Impact on Extraction Yield	Impact on Extraction Kinetics	Potential Negative Effects
Reduced Particle Size	Increases yield by improving accessibility [28].	Significantly accelerates initial extraction rate [28].	Channeling, agglomeration, high pressure drop across bed [65].
Increased Moisture Content	Generally reduces yield of non-polar compounds; may be beneficial for some polar compounds [28].	Can slow kinetics by blocking pores and increasing diffusion resistance [28].	Clumping, microbial growth, hydrolysis of labile compounds [65].

Quantitative Parameter Selection and Standards

Establishing standardized, quantitative parameters for pre-treatment is the foundation of robust research methodology. The optimal values are matrix-specific and must be determined empirically for each new biomass; however, general ranges and principles can be established from the literature.

For particle size, a common approach is to grind the material and then classify it using a set of standardized sieves to achieve a narrow and consistent size distribution. For many plant materials, a particle size in the range of 0.25 mm to 0.50 mm offers a good balance between increased surface area and acceptable flow characteristics. A wide distribution of particle sizes should be avoided as it promotes segregation. The shape of the particles also influences packing and flow. Irregular, angular particles tend to interlock and resist flow, potentially establishing bridges and blockages in the extractor, while more spherical particles promote consistent movement [65].

For moisture content, the optimal level is often quite low. Studies have directly indicated that increased moisture content will reduce the extraction efficiency for oil-bearing seeds [28]. A typical target for many plant materials is below 10% on a wet basis. This is usually achieved by air-drying or oven-drying at mild temperatures (e.g., 40-50°C) to avoid volatile compound loss, followed by conditioning to a precise, uniform moisture level. The specific moisture content must be precisely measured and reported to ensure reproducibility.

Table 2: Recommended Pre-treatment Parameter Ranges for SC-CO2 Extraction of Bioactives

Parameter	Recommended Range for Plant Matrices	Standard Measurement Method	Key Rationale
Particle Size	0.25 - 0.50 mm (or specific mesh range, e.g., 30-60 mesh) [28]	Milling followed by sieve analysis	Optimizes surface-area-to-volume ratio and minimizes internal diffusion resistance.
Particle Size Distribution	Narrow distribution is critical [65]	Sieve analysis; Laser diffraction	Prevents segregation and ensures uniform flow and extraction.
Moisture Content	< 10% (wet basis); must be determined empirically per matrix [28]	Oven-drying at 105°C per standard methods (e.g., GB/T 6435) [66]	Prevents clumping, avoids water as a solubility barrier for non-polar compounds.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol for Particle Size Optimization and Control

Objective: To reduce and standardize the particle size of a plant matrix to a defined range for reproducible SC-CO2 extraction.

Materials:

• Raw, dried plant material (e.g., leaves, roots, seeds)
• Analytical balance
• Jaw crusher or coarse grinder
• High-speed rotary mill (e.g., knife mill, hammer mill)
• Set of standardized test sieves (e.g., 30, 60, 80 mesh)
• Mechanical sieve shaker
• Sample containers (air-tight)

Procedure:

• Coarse Grinding: Pass the raw, dried material through a jaw crusher or coarse grinder to achieve a coarse, uniform chip size of approximately 3-5 mm.
• Fine Milling: Transfer the coarse chips to a high-speed rotary mill. Mill the material using short, repeated bursts to avoid overheating, which can degrade thermolabile bioactives.
• Sieving and Classification: Weigh the milled powder and load it onto the top of a stacked set of sieves arranged in descending order of mesh size (e.g., 30 mesh on top, then 60, then 80, and a pan at the bottom). Secure the stack on a mechanical sieve shaker and operate for 10-15 minutes.
• Fraction Collection: Carefully disassemble the sieve stack. Collect the fraction retained between the 60 and 80 mesh sieves (approximate particle size range of 0.25 mm to 0.50 mm). This is the optimized, standardized sample.
• Storage: Store the classified fraction in an airtight container, protected from light and moisture, until used for extraction. The weight percentage of the collected fraction relative to the total milled mass should be recorded as the yield of the pre-treatment process.

Protocol for Moisture Content Determination and Standardization

Objective: To accurately measure and adjust the moisture content of the pre-ground plant material to a pre-defined target value.

Materials:

• Plant material (before or after particle size reduction)
• Analytical balance (± 0.1 mg)
• Water spray bottle (fine mist)
• Vacuum desiccator or sealed conditioning chamber
• Hygrometer (if available)
• Oven capable of maintaining 105 ± 2°C
• Dry, pre-weighed moisture dishes (e.g., aluminum)

Part A: Determination of Initial Moisture Content

• Sample Weighing: Pre-weigh an empty, clean, and dry moisture dish (Mdish). Add approximately 2-5 g of the plant sample to the dish and record the total weight (Mtotal_initial).
• Oven Drying: Place the dish in the oven at 105°C. Dry continuously for a minimum of 4-6 hours, or until constant weight is achieved (i.e., weight change of less than 0.001 g between successive weighings spaced 1 hour apart) [66].
• Final Weighing: Remove the dish from the oven, transfer to a desiccator to cool to room temperature. Weigh the dish with the dried sample (Mtotalfinal).
• Calculation: Calculate the initial moisture content (MCinitial) on a wet basis using the formula: *MCinitial (%) = [(Mtotalinitial - Mtotalfinal) / (Mtotalinitial - M_dish)] * 100*

Part B: Standardization of Moisture Content

• Water Addition Calculation: If the initial moisture content is below the target, calculate the mass of water (Mwater) required to be added to a known mass of sample (Msample) to achieve the target moisture content (MCtarget): *Mwater = Msample * [(MCtarget - MCinitial) / (100 - MCtarget)]*
• Conditioning: Transfer the sample to a sealed container. Using a fine mist spray bottle, uniformly add the calculated mass of water onto the sample while gently tumbling the container to ensure even distribution.
• Equilibration: Seal the container and allow it to rest for a minimum of 24 hours at 4°C to permit the moisture to equilibrate uniformly throughout the matrix [66].
• Verification: After equilibration, repeat the moisture content determination (Part A) on a sub-sample to verify that the target moisture content has been achieved.

Workflow Integration and Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical sequence and decision points involved in the sample pre-treatment workflow, integrating both moisture and particle size control.

Sample Pre-treatment Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The following table details key materials and equipment essential for implementing the described pre-treatment protocols in a research setting.

Table 3: Essential Materials and Reagents for Sample Pre-treatment

Item	Function/Application	Key Specifications for Research
Laboratory Mill	To reduce particle size of biomass.	High-speed rotary mill (knife or hammer); variable speed control; cooling jacket for heat-sensitive materials.
Test Sieve Set	To classify milled material into precise particle size ranges.	ISO 3310-1 standard; stainless steel frame and mesh; common mesh sizes: 30, 60, 80, 100.
Mechanical Sieve Shaker	To ensure reproducible and efficient particle size separation.	Programmable time and amplitude; accommodates multiple sieves simultaneously.
Analytical Oven	To determine and standardize moisture content.	Forced air circulation; temperature stability of ± 1°C up to 200°C.
Analytical Balance	For precise weighing of samples and reagents.	Capacity ≥ 200 g, readability 0.1 mg.
Vacuum Desiccator	For cooling dried samples without moisture reabsorption.	Equipped with a vacuum stopcock and desiccant (e.g., silica gel).
Conditioning Chambers	For equilibrating sample moisture content.	Sealed containers with inert linings (e.g., glass jars).

Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO₂) extraction has emerged as a green and efficient alternative to conventional solvent-based techniques for isolating bioactive compounds from natural sources [2]. This technology leverages CO₂ above its critical point (31.1°C, 73.8 bar), where it exhibits unique gas-like diffusivity and liquid-like solvating power, enabling selective extraction under tunable conditions [67]. The process is particularly valued for preserving the integrity of thermally sensitive molecules, eliminating toxic solvent residues, and reducing environmental impact [2] [68]. However, its widespread implementation in research and industrial applications requires carefully balancing extraction efficiency, operational costs, and energy consumption, especially during scale-up.

The growing demand for natural products in pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and cosmetics is accelerating the adoption of scCOâ‚‚ extraction [69] [70]. For researchers and drug development professionals, understanding the technical and economic parameters that govern process scalability is essential for developing viable extraction protocols. This application note provides a structured framework to navigate these complexities, supported by quantitative data, detailed methodologies, and strategic insights.

Key Efficiency Parameters and Operational Data

The efficiency of scCOâ‚‚ extraction is governed by several interdependent parameters. Optimizing these factors is crucial for maximizing yield and purity while managing energy and cost inputs.

Core Performance Drivers

• Selectivity and Tunability: By adjusting pressure and temperature, the solvating power of scCOâ‚‚ can be finely tuned to target specific compound classes, reducing the need for subsequent purification steps [2] [67]. This selectivity is a key efficiency advantage over conventional methods.
• Mass Transfer Properties: The low viscosity and high diffusivity of supercritical COâ‚‚ facilitate deeper penetration into solid matrices like plant biomass, improving extraction kinetics and yield [2].
• Thermal Integrity Maintenance: Operating at moderately low temperatures (often 40-60°C) prevents the degradation of thermolabile bioactives, preserving their biological activity—a critical concern for pharmaceutical applications [2] [67].

Quantitative Operational Data

The following table summarizes key operational parameters and their impact on efficiency and cost, synthesized from industry and research data.

Table 1: Key Operational Parameters for scCOâ‚‚ Extraction and Their Impact

Parameter	Typical Research Scale Range	Typical Industrial Scale Range	Primary Impact on Efficiency	Primary Impact on Cost
Pressure (bar)	100 - 400 [67]	200 - 500 [70]	↑ Solvation power, ↑ yield of heavier compounds	↑ Energy consumption, ↑ capital equipment cost
Temperature (°C)	31 - 80 [67]	40 - 70 [70]	↑ Vapor pressure of solutes, modifies selectivity	↑ Energy consumption for heating
CO₂ Flow Rate	Varies with vessel size	Varies with vessel size	↑ Mass transfer, reduces extraction time	↑ CO₂ consumption & recycling costs
Extraction Time	1 - 4 hours [67]	2 - 6 hours [70]	Longer time can ↑ exhaustive yield	↑ Operational (energy, labor) costs
Use of Co-solvents	1 - 15% (e.g., Ethanol) [67]	5 - 15% (e.g., Ethanol) [70]	↑ Yield of polar compounds (e.g., phenolics)	Adds solvent removal step, ↑ purity cost

Scaling Up: Strategies and Economic Analysis

Transitioning from laboratory research to industrial production introduces significant challenges in maintaining efficiency and managing costs. A proactive understanding of scale-up economics is vital.

Scalability and Cost Drivers

Scale-up often leads to improved economic viability due to the dilution of fixed costs and increased productivity [71]. Techno-economic analyses indicate that Cost of Manufacturing (COM) can decrease by approximately half when moving from pilot (e.g., 2x30 L) to industrial scale (e.g., 2x3000 L) [71]. The primary cost drivers at an industrial scale are:

• Raw Materials: The single largest cost component, highlighting the need for efficient biomass utilization [71].
• Utilities: Energy for maintaining pressure, temperature, and COâ‚‚ circulation represents a major operational expense [71].
• Fixed Capital Investment (FCI): High-pressure vessels, pumps, and control systems require significant initial investment, though their impact on per-unit COM decreases with scale [70] [71].

Economic Feasibility Indicators

Computer simulations using tools like SuperPro Designer are invaluable for forecasting economic performance. Key indicators for a viable scCOâ‚‚ process include:

• Return on Investment (ROI): Promising processes can show a payback period of under two years [71].
• Net Present Value (NPV): A positive NPV confirms long-term profitability.
• Sensitivity to Product Price: Profitability is highly sensitive to the selling price of the final extract, underscoring the importance of targeting high-value markets like pharmaceuticals [71].

Table 2: Economic Analysis of Bioactive Extraction at Different Scales (Based on a Model Process) [71]

Economic Indicator	Pilot Scale (e.g., 2x30 L)	Industrial Scale (e.g., 2x3000 L)	Trend & Implication
Cost of Manufacturing (COM)	Base Value	~50% reduction from pilot	Significant economies of scale
Total Capital Investment (TCI)	Lower base	Significantly higher	High initial barrier, offset at scale
Payback Time	> 2 years	< 2 years (favorable scenarios)	Improved financial viability at scale
Main Cost Contributors	Labor, Utilities	Raw Materials, Utilities	Sourcing and energy management are key

Experimental Protocols for scCOâ‚‚ Extraction

This section provides a detailed, citable protocol for the extraction of bioactive compounds from plant biomass using a supercritical COâ‚‚ system, adaptable for both initial research and scale-up studies.

Standardized Research-Scale Extraction Protocol

Application: Extraction of non-polar to moderately polar bioactive compounds (e.g., essential oils, carotenoids, phytosterols) from dried and milled plant material.

Materials and Reagents:

• Plant Biomass: Dried and homogenized (e.g., passion fruit rinds, seaweed, leaves), particle size 250-500 µm.
• COâ‚‚ Source: Food-grade or research-grade carbon dioxide (≥ 99.9% purity).
• Co-solvent (if required): HPLC-grade ethanol or methanol.
• scCOâ‚‚ Extraction System: Equipped with a high-pressure vessel, pump, heater, separator, and back-pressure regulator.

Procedure:

• Biomass Preparation: Weigh 50-500 g of dried, milled biomass (exact mass to be recorded). Load it into the extraction vessel, ensuring even packing to avoid channeling.
• System Seal and Pre-heat: Secure the vessel and pre-heat the entire system to the target temperature (e.g., 40-60°C).
• Static Extraction (Optional): Pressurize the system with COâ‚‚ to the desired pressure (e.g., 250-350 bar). Once conditions are stable, maintain a static hold for 10-30 minutes to allow COâ‚‚ saturation of the matrix.
• Dynamic Extraction: Initiate the continuous flow of COâ‚‚ at a predetermined flow rate (e.g., 10-40 g/min). The total extraction time (typically 1-3 hours) should be optimized based on kinetic studies.
• Compound Separation: Direct the COâ‚‚-extract mixture into the separator. Depressurize to induce a gaseous state transition in COâ‚‚, causing the extracted compounds to precipitate.
• Collection: Collect the extract from the separator vessel. Weigh and store in airtight, light-protected containers at recommended conditions (e.g., -20°C).
• System Shutdown: Depressurize the system completely and clean the vessel.

Analysis: Analyze the extract for yield, purity, and bioactivity using relevant methods (e.g., HPLC for specific compounds, GC-MS for volatiles, antioxidant assays).

Protocol for Scaling and Optimization

For scale-up and parameter optimization, a structured design of experiments (DoE) is recommended.

• Define Objective: Maximize yield of a target bioactive or a combination of yield and purity.
• Identify Critical Parameters: Typically includes pressure, temperature, flow rate, and co-solvent percentage.
• Design Experiment: Use a response surface methodology (e.g., Central Composite Design) to efficiently explore the parameter space.
• Execute and Model: Run extractions as per the DoE matrix. Fit the data to a mathematical model to identify optimal conditions and interaction effects.
• Validate: Perform a confirmation run at the predicted optimum parameters.

Visualization of the scCOâ‚‚ Extraction Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow and decision-making process involved in developing and scaling a scCOâ‚‚ extraction process, from initial research to industrial implementation.

Scaling Supercritical CO2 Extraction - This flowchart outlines the development pathway from lab research to industrial implementation, highlighting the critical role of economic analysis.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Successful scCOâ‚‚ research relies on specific materials and reagents. The following table details essential components and their functions.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for scCOâ‚‚ Extraction

Item	Specification / Example	Primary Function in scCOâ‚‚ Research
Carbon Dioxide	High Purity (≥ 99.9%), often with dip tube	Primary supercritical solvent fluid.
Co-solvents	HPLC-grade Ethanol, Methanol, Water	Enhance solubility of polar bioactive compounds (e.g., phenolics, flavonoids).
Raw Biomass	Dried, milled plant/algæ material (250-500 µm)	Source of target bioactive compounds. Particle size impacts extraction kinetics.
scCOâ‚‚ Extraction System	Lab-scale (e.g., < 50 L capacity) [70]	Core equipment to create and maintain supercritical conditions for extraction.
Analytical Standards	Certified Reference Standards (e.g., pure vitexin, β-carotene)	Quantification and identification of target compounds in the extract via HPLC, GC-MS.
Nanofiltration Membranes	DK, DL, NF270 types [71]	Downstream concentration and purification of bioactive extracts from collection solvents.

Supercritical COâ‚‚ extraction presents a powerful, sustainable platform for isolating high-value bioactives, aligning with the principles of green chemistry and the circular bioeconomy [2] [72]. For researchers and drug developers, the path to commercial viability hinges on a disciplined approach that integrates process optimization with rigorous economic assessment from the earliest stages. By systematically managing the interplay between efficiency parameters like pressure and temperature, and cost drivers like raw materials and capital investment, scientists can effectively navigate the challenges of scalability and energy consumption. The continued integration of scCOâ‚‚ with other innovative technologies and its application within biorefinery models promise to further enhance its sustainability and economic profile, solidifying its role in the future of natural product extraction [2] [67].

Interpreting GC/MS and HPLC Data for Extract Characterization and Process Adjustment

Within supercritical carbon dioxide (Sc-CO2) extraction research, analytical techniques like Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) are fundamental for characterizing extracts and providing data-driven feedback for process optimization. This application note details standardized protocols for interpreting analytical results to adjust Sc-CO2 parameters, enhancing yield, purity, and bioactivity of target bioactives. The integration of robust analytical data ensures the reproducibility and efficacy of extracts intended for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical development.

Experimental Protocols for Sc-CO2 Extraction and Analysis

Standardized Sc-CO2 Extraction Workflow

The general workflow for extracting bioactive compounds using Sc-CO2 involves several critical steps, from sample preparation to extract collection [14] [34].

Sample Preparation:

• Drying: Plant materials should be lyophilized or air-dried to a low moisture content (<10%). High moisture can cause mechanical issues and reduce extraction efficiency, as water has low solubility in Sc-CO2 [14].
• Milling and Sieving: The dried material is ground into a powder and sieved to a controlled particle size, typically between 0.25 mm and 0.80 mm. Smaller particles increase the surface area for extraction but excessively fine powder can impede CO2 flow [14] [34].

Extraction Procedure:

• Loading: A predetermined mass (e.g., 3-100 g) of prepared sample is loaded into the extraction vessel [73] [74].
• Parameter Setting: Set the Sc-CO2 system to the desired operational parameters. Key variables include:
  • Pressure: 150 - 500 bar
  • Temperature: 40 - 70 °C
  • CO2 Flow Rate: 10 - 35 g/min
  • Extraction Time: 70 min - 4 hours
  • Co-solvent: If used (e.g., ethanol, water), set the flow rate (e.g., 0.05 - 5% of CO2 flow rate) [75] [73] [34].
• Extraction and Collection: Initiate the extraction process. The extract is collected in an amber vessel after CO2 decompression, weighed to determine yield, and stored at -20 °C prior to analysis [73] [34].

HPLC Analysis for Polar Bioactives

This protocol is adapted from the validation of an HPLC method for quantifying a pyrrolidine alkaloid in Piper amalago L. extracts [76].

• Equipment: HPLC system with a gradient pump and Photodiode Array (PDA) or UV-Vis detector.
• Column: C18 reverse-phase column (e.g., 250 x 4.6 mm, 5 µm).
• Mobile Phase: A gradient of water (with 1% acetic acid) and acetonitrile.
  • Elution Program: 58:42 acetonitrile-water (1% acetic acid) for 10 min, followed by a shift to 100% acetonitrile from 11 to 15 min [76].
• Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min.
• Detection Wavelength: 260 nm (for alkaloids); adjust based on the target compound's maximum absorption (e.g., 452 nm for lycopene) [76] [34].
• Injection Volume: 10-20 µL.
• Temperature: 25 °C (ambient temperature or controlled column oven).

Method Validation Parameters (as per [76]):

• Linearity: Establish a calibration curve with at least 5 concentrations of the standard. A correlation coefficient (r²) of >0.998 is expected.
• Precision: Evaluate repeatability (intra-day) and intermediate precision (inter-day) with triplicate injections at low, mid, and high concentrations. Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) should be <5%.
• Accuracy: Perform a recovery test by spiking a pre-analyzed sample with a known amount of standard. Recovery of 85-115% is generally acceptable for complex samples.
• Limits of Detection (LOD) and Quantification (LOQ): Typically determined as 3.3σ/S and 10σ/S, respectively, where σ is the standard deviation of the response and S is the slope of the calibration curve.

GC/MS Analysis for Volatile and Non-Polar Compounds

This protocol is based on methodologies used for profiling Sc-CO2 extracts from various plant sources [75] [74].

• Equipment: GC system coupled with a Mass Spectrometer (MSD).
• Column: Non-polar or low-polarity capillary column (e.g., DB-5MS, 30 m x 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness).
• Carrier Gas: Helium, at a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.
• Temperature Program:
  • Injector Temperature: 250-280 °C
  • Oven Program: Start at 60 °C (hold 2 min), ramp to 300 °C at 5-10 °C/min, and hold for 5-10 min.
• Injection Volume: 1 µL in split or splitless mode, depending on concentration.
• MSD Conditions:
  • Ion Source Temperature: 230 °C
  • Electron Ionization (EI) Energy: 70 eV
  • Mass Scan Range: 50-600 m/z
• Sample Preparation: Extracts are often dissolved in an appropriate solvent like hexane or chloroform and filtered before injection. Saponification may be required for complex lipid matrices [74].

Data Interpretation and Process Feedback

Quantitative Analysis of Extract Composition

Data from HPLC and GC/MS analyses allow for the quantification of specific bioactive compounds. The table below summarizes quantitative findings from recent Sc-CO2 studies.

Table 1: Quantitative Bioactive Compound Yields from Sc-CO2 Extraction of Various Biomass

Biomass Source	Target Compound(s)	Optimal Sc-CO2 Conditions	Yield	Analytical Method	Reference
P. halepensis Petals	Bioactives (total)	300-500 bar, 30 min	~80% recovery	HPLC-DAD / GC-MS	[75]
P. amalago L. Leaves	Pyrrolidine Alkaloid	12.55 MPa, 40 °C	600.53 mg/g extract	Validated HPLC	[76]
Corn Grains (Zea mays)	Polyphenolics (total)	200 bar, 55 °C	2.20 mg/g	HPLC-MS/MS	[77]
Quebec LSD Cannabis	Δ9-THC	235 bar, 55 °C, 2 h	64.3 g/100 g biomass	HPLC	[73]
Grapefruit	Lycopene	305 bar, 70 °C, 135 min	Optimum yield reported	SFC*	[34]
P. sitchensis	Polyprenol	200 bar, 70 °C, 7 h (with EtOH)	6.35 mg/g DW	HPLC	[74]

*SFC: Supercritical Fluid Chromatography

Correlating Analytical Data with Sc-CO2 Parameters

Interpreting chromatographic data provides direct insights for adjusting the Sc-CO2 process.

Using HPLC Data for Process Adjustment:

• Low Yield of Target Compound: If HPLC quantification shows a low concentration of the target molecule, consider increasing pressure to enhance SC-CO2 density and solvation power, or extending the extraction time [14] [73]. For polar compounds, introducing a co-solvent like ethanol is highly effective [76] [73].
• Presence of Unwanted Compounds: If the chromatogram shows peaks for undesirable polar impurities, reducing or eliminating a polar co-solvent can improve selectivity. Tuning temperature and pressure can also modulate selectivity [2] [14].
• Compound Degradation: The appearance of degradation products or a lower-than-expected yield of a thermolabile compound suggests the temperature is too high. Sc-CO2 allows for operation at lower temperatures to preserve bioactive integrity [78].

Using GC/MS Data for Process Adjustment:

• Profile of Volatiles: GC/MS is ideal for monitoring terpenes, sterols, and fatty acids. A complex chromatogram with many terpenes might indicate good overall extraction, but if specific high-value terpenes are low, fine-tuning temperature and pressure can exploit differences in volatility and solubility [14] [79].
• Identification of Novel Compounds: GC/MS can identify new chemical entities in a species, as seen with P. halepensis, where seven new compounds were reported. This can redefine the value of the extract and justify process optimization for these specific molecules [75].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the iterative cycle of extraction, analysis, and process adjustment.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful execution of these protocols requires specific high-quality materials and reagents.

Table 2: Essential Reagent Solutions for Sc-CO2 Extraction and Analysis

Category	Item	Function/Application	Example from Literature
Extraction	Supercritical CO₂ (≥99.5%)	Primary solvent for extraction.	Used in all cited studies [75] [73] [34].
	Ethanol (≥99.8%), Water	Polar co-solvents to enhance extraction of medium-polarity compounds (e.g., polyphenols, alkaloids).	Ethanol used in [73] [74]; Water used in [75].
Chromatography	HPLC-grade Solvents (Acetonitrile, Methanol, Water)	Mobile phase components for HPLC analysis.	Acetonitrile-water with acetic acid used in [76].
	Acetic Acid / Formic Acid	Mobile phase additives to improve peak shape and separation of acidic compounds.	1% Acetic acid in water [76]; Formic acid for MS compatibility [77].
	GC-MS grade solvents (Hexane, Chloroform)	Sample dilution and preparation for GC-MS analysis.	Hexane:acetone (1:1 v/v) for solvent extraction [74].
Standards & Analysis	Certified Reference Standards	Quantification and identification of target bioactive compounds via calibration curves.	Δ9-THC, CBG, CBN standards [73]; Polyprenol standard mixes [74].
	Derivatization Reagents	For GC-MS analysis of non-volatile compounds, to increase volatility and thermal stability.	Saponification with KOH/methanol [74].
	Filter Membranes (0.22 µm PVDF)	Removal of particulate matter from samples prior to HPLC/GC injection.	0.22 µm PVDF membrane for lycopene sample [34].

Quality Control and Data-Driven Process Adjustment

A systematic approach to quality control is vital. The validated HPLC method must be monitored using system suitability tests before each analytical run [76]. For GC/MS, a tuning check with a standard compound should be performed. The following diagram outlines the quality control workflow that connects analytical results directly to process parameter adjustments.

Efficacy Validation and Comparative Analysis Against Conventional Methods

Benchmarking SC-CO2: Yield and Efficiency vs. Soxhlet and Solvent Extraction

Within the paradigm of green chemistry, the extraction of bioactive compounds from natural sources has seen a significant shift from conventional solvent-based methods towards advanced, sustainable techniques. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction has emerged as a prominent technology in this landscape, particularly for applications in pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and food industries where extract purity and bioactivity are critical. This application note provides a systematic, quantitative benchmarking of SC-CO2 against traditional Soxhlet and maceration methods. Framed within broader thesis research on optimizing bioactive extraction, this analysis focuses on key performance indicators—extraction yield, bioactive content, and operational efficiency—using data from recent, high-quality studies on rosemary, cannabis, and microalgae. The protocols and data summarized herein are designed to equip researchers and drug development professionals with the evidence and methodologies necessary to inform their extraction strategy.

Comparative Performance Data

The efficacy of an extraction method is ultimately determined by its yield and the quality of the final product. The following tables consolidate quantitative data from recent studies, providing a direct comparison of SC-CO2 (with and without co-solvents) against conventional techniques.

Table 1: Comparative Extraction Yield and Bioactive Content

Matrix	Target Compound	Extraction Method	Key Parameters	Yield / Content	Reference
Rosemary	Rosmarinic Acid (RA)	SC-CO2 + 15% EtOH	150 bar, 80°C	3.43 mg/g DM	[59]
		SC-CO2 + Soxhlet	Sequential Process	5.78 mg/g DM	[59]
		Soxhlet (Ethanol)	Conventional	Lower than sequential	[59]
Cannabis	Cannabidiol (CBD)	SC-CO2 + EtOH	Not Specified	+37.1% vs. neat SC-CO2	[80]
		Soxhlet	Conventional	Lower than SC-CO2/EtOH	[80]
		Maceration	Room Temperature	Lowest	[80]
Microalgae	Carotenoids/Lipids	SC-CO2	Varies with species	High for non-polar compounds	[81]

Table 2: Qualitative and Bioactivity Assessment

Metric	SC-CO2 Extraction	Conventional Solvent Extraction
Solvent Residue	Solvent-free (CO2)	Toxic solvent residues possible	[13] [82]
Thermolabile Compound Integrity	Excellent (Low operating temps)	Risk of degradation (High temps)	[13] [80]
Selectivity	Highly tunable (P, T, co-solvent)	Limited, less selective	[13] [64]
Extract Bioactivity	Superior antioxidant & anti-inflammatory activity	Lower reported bioactivity	[80]
Environmental Impact	Green process, low waste	High solvent consumption, hazardous waste	[13] [64]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: SC-CO2 Extraction of Rosmarinic Acid from Rosemary

This optimized protocol for extracting rosmarinic acid (RA) from Rosmarinus officinalis L. is based on a response surface methodology study [59].

• 1. Sample Preparation:

  • Material: Harvest rosemary leaves, preferably in spring.
  • Drying: Air-dry the plant material away from direct sunlight.
  • Milling: Mill the dried leaves into a fine powder using a laboratory grinder. Sieve to obtain a homogeneous particle size (e.g., 250-500 µm).
  • Moisture Content: Ensure moisture content is below a critical level (e.g., <10%) to prevent ice formation and clogging during SC-CO2 extraction.

• 2. SC-CO2 Extraction Setup & Execution:

  • Equipment: A typical SC-CO2 system consists of a CO2 cylinder, chiller, pump, co-solvent pump, extraction vessel housed in an oven, back-pressure regulator, and separator.
  • Loading: Pack the extraction vessel evenly with the powdered rosemary biomass to avoid channeling.
  • Parameters: Set the optimal parameters as determined by [59]:
    • Pressure: 150 bar
    • Temperature: 80 °C
    • Co-solvent: 15% (w/w) Food-grade ethanol (EtOH)
    • CO2 Flow Rate: As per system capacity (e.g., 10-20 g/min for lab-scale).
    • Extraction Time: Typically 1-3 hours, or until exhaustion.
  • Process: The system is pressurized and heated to supercritical conditions. The SC-CO2/EtOH mixture passes through the biomass, solubilizing the target compounds. The solution is then expanded into a separator where CO2 loses its solvent power and is vented for recycling, leaving the RA-rich extract in the collection vessel.

• 3. Sequential SC-CO2-Soxhlet Extraction (Optional Enhancement):

  • Rationale: To recover the residual RA trapped in the biomass after SC-CO2 treatment.
  • Procedure: Transfer the spent rosemary matrix from the SC-CO2 vessel to a Soxhlet apparatus.
  • Soxhlet Extraction: Perform extraction with a suitable solvent (e.g., ethanol) for 6-12 hours. This sequential coupling has been shown to increase RA content by nearly 70% compared to SC-CO2 alone [59].

• 4. Analysis:

  • Yield: Determine the total extract weight gravimetrically.
  • RA Content: Quantify RA concentration using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) against a certified RA standard.

Protocol 2: Comparative Extraction of Cannabinoids from Cannabis

This protocol outlines the methodology for a direct comparison of extraction methods for cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa L., as described by [80].

• 1. Sample Preparation:

  • Material: Use a standardized variety (e.g., Purple 52).
  • Drying: Dry flower buds at 55°C for 72 hours.
  • Grinding: Finely grind the dried material.
  • Decarboxylation (Critical Step): Heat the ground biomass at 140°C for 1 hour to convert acidic cannabinoids (e.g., CBDa) to their neutral, bioactive forms (e.g., CBD).

• 2. Parallel Extraction Methods:

  • SC-CO2 with Co-solvent:
    • Parameters: Use ethanol as a co-solvent. Optimize pressure and temperature (e.g., 250-350 bar, 50-60°C).
    • Process: Dynamic extraction for a fixed period (e.g., 2 hours).
  • Soxhlet Extraction:
    • Solvent: Use ethanol or hexane.
    • Process: Extract for 6-8 hours until the solvent in the siphon tube becomes clear.
  • Maceration:
    • Solvent: Use ethanol at a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:10.
    • Process: Agitate the mixture at room temperature for 24-48 hours in a sealed container.

• 3. Post-Extraction Processing:

  • For all liquid extracts (Soxhlet, maceration, and SC-CO2 extract dissolved in solvent), remove the solvent using a rotary evaporator at reduced pressure and controlled temperature (e.g., 40°C).
  • Weigh the crude extract to determine yield.

• 4. Analytical and Bioactivity Assessment:

  • Cannabinoid Profile: Analyze all extracts using validated HPLC to quantify CBD, CBDa, and other cannabinoids.
  • Antioxidant Activity: Evaluate using the DPPH radical scavenging assay.
  • Anti-inflammatory Activity: Assess by measuring the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, IL-6) in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells.

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Item	Function/Application	Key Considerations
Supercritical Fluid Extraction System	Core apparatus for SC-CO2 extraction.	Must withstand high pressures (e.g., 150-700 bar); includes pump, oven, pressure vessels, and separator.	[13]
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)	Primary supercritical solvent.	High purity (99.99%); food-grade; non-toxic, non-flammable.	[13] [64]
Co-solvents (e.g., Ethanol)	Enhances solubility of polar compounds.	Food-grade ethanol is preferred for its safety and GRAS status; concentration typically 5-15%.	[59] [64]
Soxhlet Apparatus	Benchmark conventional extraction.	Standard glassware for exhaustive extraction with organic solvents.	[82] [59]
HPLC System with PDA/UV	Quantification of target bioactive compounds.	Essential for validating yield and purity; requires certified analytical standards.	[59] [80]

Workflow and Pathway Visualization

Within the broader scope of research on supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-COâ‚‚) extraction of bioactives, this application note addresses a critical challenge: the preservation of bioactivity during the extraction process. The efficacy of bioactive compounds from natural sources is highly dependent on the extraction technique employed. Conventional solvent-based methods often utilize high temperatures and toxic solvents, which can degrade thermolabile compounds and diminish their therapeutic potential [83]. SC-COâ‚‚ extraction emerges as a green alternative, operating under mild conditions to better preserve the structural integrity and, consequently, the biological activity of target molecules [2]. This protocol provides a comparative framework for evaluating the antioxidant and anticancer activities of extracts obtained via SC-COâ‚‚, enabling researchers to quantitatively assess the functional superiority of this method.

Quantitative Comparison of Bioactive Compound Recovery and Activity

The following tables consolidate key quantitative findings from recent studies, demonstrating the impact of extraction methodology on the yield and potency of bioactive compounds.

Table 1: Impact of Extraction Method on Phytochemical Yield and Antioxidant Activity

Plant Material	Extraction Method	Key Operational Parameters	Total Phenolic/Flavonoid Content	Antioxidant Activity (ICâ‚…â‚€ or equivalent)	Reference
Saussurea costus	SC-CO₂	10 MPa, 40 °C	N/A	DPPH IC₅₀: 14.4 μg/mL	[83] [84]
Saussurea costus	SC-CO₂	48 MPa, 40 °C	N/A	DPPH IC₅₀: >14.4 μg/mL	[83] [84]
Clinacanthus nutans	SC-CO₂ + Ethanol-Water Co-solvent	35 MPa, 60 °C	Flavonoids: 88 mg QE/g	To be determined	[85]
Clinacanthus nutans	Ethanol Maceration	7 days, room temperature	Flavonoids: ~41.9 mg QE/g	To be determined	[85]
Rice Bran	EAAE + SC-CO₂	Optimized enzyme mix, 40 °C	N/A	DPPH: 6.53 mg TE/g oil; EC₅₀: 4.60 mg/mL	[86]
Rice Bran	Hexane Extraction	Conventional solvent	N/A	DPPH: <6.53 mg TE/g oil; ECâ‚…â‚€: >4.60 mg/mL	[86]
Wild Ganoderma lucidum	Ethanol Extraction (Soxhlet)	70% Ethanol, 60 °C	Phenolics: 376.5 mg GAE/g	DPPH IC₅₀: Consistent activity	[87]

Table 2: Comparative Anticancer Activity (Cytotoxicity) of Plant Extracts

Plant Material	Extraction Method	Cell Line Tested	ICâ‚…â‚€ Value	Key Bioactive Compounds Identified	Reference
Saussurea costus	SC-CO₂ at 10 MPa	HCT-116 (Colon)	0.44 μg/mL	á-Elemene, Cedran-diol, Eremanthin	[83] [84]
Saussurea costus	SC-CO₂ at 10 MPa	MCF-7 (Breast)	0.46 μg/mL	á-Elemene, Cedran-diol, Eremanthin	[83] [84]
Saussurea costus	SC-CO₂ at 10 MPa	HepG-2 (Liver)	0.74 μg/mL	á-Elemene, Cedran-diol, Eremanthin	[83] [84]
Saussurea costus	SC-CO₂ at 48 MPa	HCT-116 (Colon)	36.02 μg/mL	Loss of valuable compounds	[83] [84]
Clinacanthus nutans	SC-CO₂ + Co-solvent	HeLa (Cervical)	158 μg/mL (48h)	Phytosterols, Galactolipids	[85]
Wild Ganoderma lucidum	Ethanol Extraction	HeLa (Cervical)	>65% inhibition (at 1000 μg/mL)	Hinokione, Ferruginol, Ergosterol	[87]

Experimental Protocols for Key Assays

Protocol for Supercritical COâ‚‚ Extraction of Plant Material

This protocol is adapted from optimized procedures for extracting Saussurea costus [83] [84] and Clinacanthus nutans [85].

• Principle: SC-COâ‚‚ utilizes carbon dioxide above its critical point (Tc = 31.1 °C, Pc = 7.38 MPa) as a solvent, possessing liquid-like density and gas-like diffusivity for efficient and tunable extraction [2] [88].
• Materials:
  • Supercritical fluid extractor (e.g., JBG0.5, Wenzhou Chinz Machinery)
  • COâ‚‚ cylinder with siphon
  • Plant material (e.g., S. costus powder, dried and ground)
  • Cooling bath
  • Collection vials
• Procedure:
  • Sample Preparation: Load 5 grams of finely ground plant material into the extraction vessel.
  • System Pressurization: Program the extractor's control panel to the desired temperature (e.g., 40 °C) and pressure (e.g., 10, 20, 48 MPa). Initiate the COâ‚‚ flow.
  • Dynamic Extraction: Once operational conditions are stable, open the valve to allow COâ‚‚ to pass through the sample at a flow rate of 5 mL/min for a set duration (e.g., 30 minutes).
  • Collection: The extracted oil is separated from the COâ‚‚ upon depressurization and collected in a glass vial. Weigh the extract to calculate percentage yield.
• Notes: For polar compounds, a co-solvent (e.g., 15% v/v 80:20 ethanol-water) can be added to enhance solubility [85].

Protocol for DPPH Radical Scavenging Antioxidant Assay

This protocol is standardized across multiple studies [83] [87] [85].

• Principle: Antioxidants reduce the stable DPPH radical (purple) to its non-radical form (yellow), which is monitored spectrophotometrically.
• Materials:
  • UV-Vis Spectrophotometer
  • DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) solution (0.2 mM in methanol)
  • Test extracts at various concentrations
  • Methanol (analytical grade)
  • Microplates or test tubes
• Procedure:
  • Add 40 μL of the extract (or standard) at different concentrations to 3 mL of 0.2 mM DPPH solution [83]. For microplate assays, scale down volumes proportionally.
  • Vortex the mixture and incubate in the dark for 30 minutes at room temperature.
  • Measure the absorbance of the solution at 517 nm.
  • Calculate the percentage inhibition (% I) using the formula: % I = [(A_control - A_sample) / A_control] × 100 where A_control is the absorbance of the DPPH solution with solvent only.
  • Determine the ICâ‚…â‚€ value (concentration required to scavenge 50% of DPPH radicals) from a dose-response curve.

Protocol for MTT Cytotoxicity Assay

The MTT assay is a standard method for evaluating in vitro anticancer activity [83] [87] [85].

• Principle: Viable cells reduce the yellow tetrazolium salt MTT to insoluble purple formazan crystals. The amount of formazan produced is proportional to the number of viable cells.
• Materials:
  • Cell lines (e.g., HCT-116, MCF-7, HepG-2, HeLa)
  • Cell culture medium and reagents
  • MTT solution (5 mg/mL in PBS)
  • Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
  • 96-well microplate
  • Microplate reader
• Procedure:
  • Cell Seeding: Seed cells in a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 10⁴ cells per well and incubate for 24 hours to allow adherence.
  • Treatment: Treat the cells with a concentration range of the extract (e.g., 15.63 to 500 μg/mL) and incubate for 24-48 hours.
  • MTT Incubation: Add 100 μL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) to each well and incubate for 4 hours at 37 °C.
  • Solubilization: Carefully remove the medium and dissolve the formed formazan crystals in DMSO.
  • Absorbance Measurement: Measure the absorbance at 570 nm using a microplate reader.
  • Data Analysis: Calculate cell viability as a percentage of the untreated control. The ICâ‚…â‚€ value is the concentration that results in 50% cell viability.

Signaling Pathways and Experimental Workflow

The following diagrams, generated using Graphviz DOT language, illustrate the experimental workflow and a generalized mechanism of action for the bioactive compounds.

Bioactivity Assessment Workflow

Proposed Mechanism of Bioactivity

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Bioactivity Studies

Item	Function/Application	Example from Search Results
Supercritical COâ‚‚ Extractor	Core equipment for solvent-free, tunable extraction of bioactives.	Used for all featured SC-COâ‚‚ studies [83] [85] [88].
Carbon Dioxide (Food/Pharma Grade)	The primary supercritical fluid solvent; non-toxic, recyclable.	Recognized as safe for food and pharmaceutical usage [83].
Ethanol-Water Co-solvent	Enhances SC-COâ‚‚ solubility for moderately polar to polar compounds.	80:20 ethanol-water used to extract flavonoids from C. nutans [85].
DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl)	Stable free radical used to evaluate antioxidant activity via scavenging.	Used to determine ICâ‚…â‚€ values for S. costus and other extracts [83] [87].
MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)	Tetrazolium salt used to assess cell viability and cytotoxic potential.	Standard assay for determining ICâ‚…â‚€ on cancer cell lines [83] [87] [85].
Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent	Used for colorimetric determination of total phenolic content.	Employed to quantify phenolics in G. lucidum and other extracts [87].
GC-MS / LC-HRMS Systems	For the identification and quantification of extracted bioactive compounds.	GC-MS identified terpenes in S. costus [83]; LC-HRMS used for polyphenols [88].

Within the framework of advanced research on the supercritical carbon dioxide (scCOâ‚‚) extraction of bioactives, ensuring the quality and purity of final extracts is paramount. The presence of toxic solvent residues from traditional extraction methods and the degradation of sensitive bioactive compounds during processing represent two significant challenges in producing pharmaceutical and nutraceutical ingredients. scCOâ‚‚ extraction has emerged as a green technology that effectively addresses these issues, offering a clean alternative to conventional organic solvents while preserving the integrity of thermolabile molecules [2] [89]. This application note details protocols and analytical methodologies for quantifying solvent residues and assessing compound degradation, providing researchers with a standardized framework for evaluating extract quality.

The core advantage of scCOâ‚‚ technology lies in the tunable physicochemical properties of supercritical carbon dioxide. Its liquid-like density and gas-like diffusivity enable efficient penetration of biomass and selective extraction under mild, oxygen-free conditions that minimize thermal degradation [2] [78]. Furthermore, scCOâ‚‚ leaves no toxic solvent residues in the final product, as COâ‚‚ simply reverts to a gaseous state upon depressurization [89]. The following sections present quantitative data on the efficacy of scCOâ‚‚ in residue removal and compound preservation, alongside detailed experimental protocols for implementation and analysis.

Quantitative Analysis of scCOâ‚‚ Performance

Solvent Residue Elimination from Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

scCOâ‚‚ technology has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in eliminating Class 2 and Class 3 solvent residues from Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs). The table below summarizes experimental data from a purification process for two model APIs.

Table 1: Elimination of solvent residues from APIs using scCOâ‚‚

API Name	Initial Total Solvent Residues (ppm)	Final Total Solvent Residues (ppm)	Optimal scCOâ‚‚ Conditions (Pressure, Temperature, Flow Rate)	Reduction Efficiency (%)
Beclometasone dipropionate	11,100	5	200 bar, 40 °C, 0.7 kg/h	99.95%
Budesonide	41,000	52	200 bar, 40 °C, 0.7 kg/h	99.87%

This scCOâ‚‚ purification process achieved a near-complete elimination of ethanol and drastically reduced other organic solvents far below levels achievable with multi-step traditional processes like static bed or fluidized bed drying [90]. The optimal conditions were identified after testing a range of pressures (80-370 bar) and COâ‚‚ flow rates (0.1-1.0 kg/h). At too low densities (e.g., 80 bar), extraction was incomplete, while excessively high pressures (e.g., 370 bar) caused non-negligible co-extraction of solid material and particle bed caking occurred at flow rates above 0.7 kg/h [90].

Preservation of Bioactive Compounds

Comparative studies on various biomass sources confirm that scCOâ‚‚ extraction better preserves the integrity of unsaturated lipids and thermally sensitive bioactive compounds compared to conventional solvent methods.

Table 2: Comparison of compound recovery and integrity: scCOâ‚‚ vs. conventional methods

Bioactive Compound / Property	Source Material	scCOâ‚‚ Extraction Result	Conventional Extraction Result	Key Advantage of scCOâ‚‚
Total Carotenoids	R. toruloides CBS 14 Yeast	332.09 ± 27.32 µg/g DW	19.9 ± 2.74 µg/g DW (Acetone)	Higher yield and avoidance of degradation from saponification [91]
Torularhodin (Major Carotenoid)	R. toruloides CBS 14 Yeast	Major component extracted	Subjected to degradation	Selective extraction and preservation of specific carotenoids [91]
Unsaturated Fatty Acids	R. toruloides CBS 14 Yeast	Higher proportion	Lower proportion	Better preservation of unsaturated lipids [91]
Rosmarinic Acid (RA)	Rosmarinus officinalis L.	3.43 ± 0.13 mg/g DM (Optimal conditions)	Varies; see protocol details	Milder conditions prevent thermal decomposition [59]

The significant difference in carotenoid yield is largely attributed to the degradation of torularhodin and torulene during the saponification step required in the conventional acetone extraction method, a step entirely avoided in the scCOâ‚‚ process [91].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: scCOâ‚‚ Purification of Solvent Residues from APIs

This protocol is adapted from a study that successfully removed solvent residues from Beclometasone dipropionate and Budesonide [90].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential materials for API purification

Item	Function/Description	Example/Specification
scCOâ‚‚ Extraction System	High-pressure vessel system for containing the API and supercritical COâ‚‚.	Must withstand pressures up to 400 bar.
Carbon Dioxide (COâ‚‚)	Supercritical solvent.	High purity (99.9%).
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)	Target solid material for purification.	Beclometasone dipropionate or Budesonide rough powder.
Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector (GC-FID)	Analytical instrument for quantifying solvent residues.	For identification and quantification of Class 2 and Class 3 solvents.

Methodology

• Sample Preparation: Load the API rough powder (e.g., Beclometasone dipropionate) directly into the extraction vessel. The material is characterized by a micrometric, irregular morphology, which is suitable for extraction [90].
• System Setup and Pressurization:
  • Seal the extraction vessel.
  • Set the system temperature to 40 °C.
  • Pressurize the system with COâ‚‚ to the target pressure of 200 bar.
  • Set the COâ‚‚ flow rate to 0.7 kg/h.
• Dynamic Extraction:
  • Maintain the above conditions for the duration of the extraction.
  • The high diffusivity and solvation power of scCOâ‚‚ at this density will dissolve and carry away the organic solvent residues trapped in the solid API matrix.
• Collection:
  • The extract, containing the dissolved solvent residues, is carried out of the vessel by the COâ‚‚ stream.
  • Upon depressurization, the COâ‚‚ converts to gas and dissipates, leaving behind the purified solvent residues for disposal.
• Analysis:
  • Analyze the purified API powder for residual solvent content using GC-FID.
  • Compare the results against the initial solvent residue concentrations to determine purification efficiency.

Protocol 2: scCOâ‚‚ Extraction of Thermolabile Bioactives from Plant Matrices

This protocol outlines the optimized extraction of rosmarinic acid (RA) from rosemary, demonstrating the preservation of a polar, bioactive compound, and can be adapted for other plant materials [59].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential materials for plant bioactive extraction

Item	Function/Description	Example/Specification
scCOâ‚‚ Extraction System with Co-solvent Pump	Allows for the introduction of a polar modifier to enhance solubility of polar compounds.
Carbon Dioxide (COâ‚‚)	Primary supercritical solvent.	High purity (99.99%).
Ethanol (Co-solvent)	Polar modifier to increase scCOâ‚‚ affinity for polar compounds like RA.	Analytical grade, anhydrous.
Plant Material	Source of bioactive compounds.	Rosmarinus officinalis L., dried and ground.
Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC)	Analytical instrument for quantifying specific bioactive compounds (e.g., RA, carnosic acid).

Methodology

• Sample Preparation:
  • Dry the rosemary leaves and grind them to a controlled particle size. Optimal results were achieved with a particle size of 0.5 mm, which offers a large surface area for extraction without causing significant flow resistance [59] [14].
  • Load the powdered plant material into the extraction vessel.
• Optimized Extraction Parameters:
  • Pressure: Set to 150 bar. This pressure provides a sufficient density for solvation without excessive co-extraction of less desirable compounds.
  • Temperature: Set to 80 °C. This temperature enhances the solubility of RA and the overall extraction yield.
  • Co-solvent: Add ethanol at 15% (w/w) of the total solvent. Ethanol is a safe, polar modifier that significantly increases the solubility of polar phenolic compounds like RA in the scCOâ‚‚ [59].
  • Extraction Time/Flow Rate: Maintain conditions until the desired amount of extract is collected.
• Extraction and Collection:
  • Initiate the scCOâ‚‚ and co-solvent flow through the extraction vessel.
  • Collect the extract from the separator after COâ‚‚ depressurization.
• Coupling with Soxhlet (Optional Enhancement):
  • To maximize yield, the residual plant matrix from the scCOâ‚‚ process can be subsequently extracted using a Soxhlet apparatus with ethanol.
  • This two-step coupling has been shown to increase the RA content in the final extract to 5.78 mg/g DM, as the initial scCOâ‚‚ treatment creates microcracks in the plant matrix, facilitating subsequent solvent penetration [59].
• Analysis:
  • Quantify the RA content in the extract using UHPLC and compare it with extracts obtained solely by conventional Soxhlet extraction.

Workflow and Pathway Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for ensuring quality and purity in scCOâ‚‚ extraction, from parameter optimization to final analysis.

Diagram 1: Quality control workflow for scCOâ‚‚ extraction

The data and protocols presented confirm that supercritical carbon dioxide extraction is a powerful tool for mitigating critical quality challenges in bioactive compound production. Its application enables the near-complete elimination of toxic organic solvent residues from APIs, achieving purity levels far beyond those of traditional multi-step processes. Simultaneously, the tunable, low-temperature operating environment of scCOâ‚‚ effectively preserves the integrity of thermolabile compounds such as carotenoids, unsaturated fatty acids, and phenolic acids, resulting in higher-quality extracts with superior bioactivity. By adopting the standardized application notes and quantitative frameworks outlined herein, researchers and drug development professionals can advance the manufacturing of safer, more potent, and higher-purity ingredients for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications, firmly supporting the transition toward greener and more sustainable processing technologies.

Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-COâ‚‚) extraction has emerged as a significant green technology for isolating bioactive compounds from natural sources. Within the broader context of research on supercritical fluid extraction, this assessment evaluates the economic and environmental dimensions of the technology, framing its sustainability against conventional solvent-based methods. The non-toxic, recyclable, and low-energy potential of SC-COâ‚‚ positions it as a cornerstone for sustainable processing in the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and food industries. This document provides a structured analysis of quantitative performance data and detailed experimental protocols to support researchers and scientists in the field.

Economic Impact: Performance and Cost Analysis

The economic viability of SC-COâ‚‚ extraction is influenced by process parameters which directly affect yield and compound purity. The following table summarizes key performance metrics from recent studies.

Table 1: Economic Performance Indicators of SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction for Various Bioactives

Bioactive Compound	Source Material	Optimal Conditions (Pressure, Temperature, Co-solvent)	Key Economic Output (Yield/Recovery)	Reference
β-carotene	Dunaliella salina microalgae	400 bar, 65 °C, CO₂ flow: 14.48 g/min	Maximum cumulative recovery: 25.48%	[92]
Fatty Acids	Dunaliella salina microalgae	550 bar, 75 °C, CO₂ flow: 14.48 g/min	Recovery: 8.47 mg/g	[92]
Polyprenol	Picea sitchensis	200 bar, 70 °C, 7 h, Ethanol co-solvent	Yield: 6.35 ± 0.4 mg/g DW	[74]
Hemp Seed Oil	Hemp Seeds	20 MPa (~200 bar), 50 °C, 244 min	Oil Yield: 28.83 g/100 g fresh seeds	[9]
Hemp Seed Oil (with 10% EtOH)	Hemp Seeds	20 MPa (~200 bar), 50 °C, 244 min	Enhanced Oil Yield: 30.13%; TPC: 294.15 GAE mg/kg	[9]
Winter Melon Seed Oil	Winter Melon Seeds	244 bar, 46 °C, 97 min	Crude Extract Yield: 176.30 mg/g dried sample	[93]
Rosmarinic Acid	Rosmarinus officinalis L.	150 bar, 80 °C, 15% Ethanol	RA Content: 3.43 ± 0.13 mg/g DM	[59]

The data indicates that optimizing parameters like pressure, temperature, and the use of co-solvents (e.g., ethanol) is crucial for maximizing yield and, consequently, improving process economics. The enhancement of bioactive compounds like phenolics in hemp seed oil with ethanol demonstrates a strategy to increase the value of the extract without a significant compromise on yield [9]. Furthermore, mechanical pre-treatment of biomass, such as the grinding of Dunaliella salina microalgae at 500 rpm for 5 minutes, has been shown to significantly enhance the recovery of target compounds like β-carotene by disrupting cell walls, thereby improving process efficiency [92].

Environmental Impact: Solvent Use and Energy Consumption

The primary environmental advantage of SC-COâ‚‚ extraction lies in its replacement of hazardous organic solvents. A comparative life-cycle assessment often reveals a more favorable environmental profile for SC-COâ‚‚.

Table 2: Environmental Impact Comparison: SC-COâ‚‚ vs. Conventional Extraction

Factor	Supercritical COâ‚‚ Extraction	Conventional Solvent Extraction
Primary Solvent	Carbon dioxide (non-toxic, non-flammable, GRAS)	Organic solvents (e.g., n-hexane, methanol) [94]
Solvent Residues	No toxic residues in extract (COâ‚‚ is gaseous at ambient conditions) [92] [9]	Requires extensive refining; risk of toxic solvent residues [9] [94]
Environmental Burden	Low; COâ‚‚ can be recycled from industrial processes	High; involves hazardous waste generation and disposal [94]
Energy Consumption	Moderate; required for compression and maintaining high pressure	Varies; can be high for solvent removal and purification
Oxidative Degradation	Low; process occurs in an oxygen-free environment, preserving oil quality [9]	Higher risk due to exposure to heat and oxygen in some methods
Selectivity & Purity	Highly tunable for selectivity, reducing downstream purification needs [95]	Less selective, often co-extracts undesirable compounds (e.g., chlorophyll) [9]

Studies directly comparing extraction methods confirm these advantages. For instance, SC-COâ‚‚ extracted winter melon seed oil demonstrated stronger antioxidant activity than oils obtained by Soxhlet and ultrasound-assisted extraction [93]. Furthermore, analysis of blackberry pomace revealed that SC-COâ‚‚ extraction produced purer oils with a higher selectivity towards essential fatty acids compared to n-hexane extraction [94].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction of Lipophilic Bioactives from Microalgae

This protocol is adapted from research on extracting β-carotene and fatty acids from Dunaliella salina [92].

• 1. Objective: To extract and recover β-carotene and fatty acids from Dunaliella salina biomass using SC-COâ‚‚.
• 2. Materials:
  • Biomass: Dried Dunaliella salina powder.
  • Extraction Vessel: High-pressure reactor rated for >550 bar.
  • Fluid System: COâ‚‚ pump and cooling unit.
  • Pre-treatment Agent: Diatomaceous Earth (DE).
  • Collection: Separator vessel.
• 3. Methodology:
  • Mechanical Pre-treatment: Mix biomass with DE (DE/Biomass ratio of 0.4). Grind the mixture at 500 rpm for 5 minutes to disrupt cell walls [92].
  • Biomass Loading: Load a precise amount (e.g., 2.45 g) of the pre-treated biomass into the extraction vessel.
  • Extraction Parameters:
    • Pressure: 400 bar (for β-carotene) or 550 bar (for fatty acids).
    • Temperature: 65 °C (for β-carotene) or 75 °C (for fatty acids).
    • COâ‚‚ Flow Rate: 14.48 g/min.
    • Extraction Time: Conduct for a total of 110 minutes, collecting fractions at 30-minute intervals to monitor cumulative recovery [92].
  • Separation & Collection: Depressurize the SC-COâ‚‚ stream containing the solutes into the separator set at a lower pressure (e.g., 40-60 bar) and near-ambient temperature. The extract is collected in the separator, while the COâ‚‚ is vented or recycled.
  • Analysis: Analyze the collected extracts for β-carotene content using HPLC and for fatty acid profile using GC-MS.

Protocol 2: Ethanol-Modified SC-COâ‚‚ for Enhanced Polar Compound Recovery

This protocol is for extracting polar bioactive compounds like polyphenols, using hemp seed oil as a model system [9].

• 1. Objective: To enhance the recovery of polar bioactive compounds (e.g., phenolics, tocopherols) in hemp seed oil using ethanol-modified SC-COâ‚‚.
• 2. Materials:
  • Source Material: Crushed hemp seeds (particle size ~500 μm).
  • Solvents: Food-grade COâ‚‚ and anhydrous ethanol (≥99.8%).
  • Equipment: SC-COâ‚‚ extraction system equipped with a co-solvent pump.
• 3. Methodology:
  • Loading: Load the crushed hemp seeds into the extraction vessel.
  • Optimized Base Parameters:
    • Pressure: 20 MPa (~200 bar).
    • Temperature: 50 °C.
    • Extraction Time: 244 minutes.
    • Pure COâ‚‚ Flow Rate: 0.25 kg/h [9].
  • Co-solvent Modification: Introduce ethanol at a flow rate calibrated to constitute 10% of the total solvent mass. This is typically achieved using a dedicated co-solvent pump.
  • Extraction & Collection: Conduct the dynamic extraction under the above conditions. The extract, now containing oil enriched with polar bioactives, is collected in a separator upon depressurization.
  • Analysis: Quantify total phenolic content (TPC) using the Folin-Ciocalteu method, tocopherols by HPLC, and fatty acid profile by GC. The oxidative stability index (OSI) can be determined using the Rancimat method.

Visualization of Workflows and Relationships

SC-COâ‚‚ Optimization and Assessment Pathway

Mass Transfer Mechanism in SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for SC-COâ‚‚ Bioactive Extraction Research

Item	Function/Application in SC-COâ‚‚ Research	Example from Context
Supercritical COâ‚‚	Primary solvent for extraction; non-toxic, tunable density/solvency.	Used as the main extraction fluid in all cited studies.
Co-solvent (Ethanol)	Modifies polarity of SC-COâ‚‚ to enhance solubility of polar bioactive compounds (e.g., phenolics).	10% ethanol increased phenolic content in hemp seed oil [9].
Diatomaceous Earth (DE)	Used as a dispersant and grinding aid in mechanical pre-treatment to improve cell disruption.	Mixed with Dunaliella salina biomass (0.4 ratio) before grinding [92].
Analytical Standards	Essential for identification and quantification of target bioactives via HPLC, GC-MS, etc.	Polyprenol standards for HPLC [74]; Rosmarinic acid for HPLC [59].
Saponification Reagents	(e.g., KOH in methanol). Used to hydrolyze and clean up lipid extracts before analysis.	Saponification of lipid extracts from tree species for polyprenol analysis [74].

The valorization of agro-food wastes (AFW) and medicinal herbs represents a critical pathway toward building sustainable food and pharmaceutical systems, reducing environmental impact, and advancing the circular bioeconomy (CBE) [96]. The consistent generation of AFW alongside increased food production requires enormous management costs to prevent ecological pollution [96]. Simultaneously, growing interest in plant-derived bioactive compounds for pharmaceutical applications demands environmentally friendly extraction technologies that preserve compound integrity while minimizing synthetic solvent use [97].

Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO₂) extraction has emerged as a versatile green technology that addresses these dual challenges effectively. SC-CO₂ possesses unique properties including zero surface tension, low viscosity, high diffusivity, and tunable solubilization power through adjustments in temperature, pressure, or cosolvent addition [10]. With its mild critical temperature (31.1°C) and pressure (7.38 MPa), SC-CO₂ is particularly suitable for extracting heat-sensitive bioactive compounds while eliminating solvent residue concerns [97] [98]. This application note details recent advances and standardized protocols for SC-CO₂ extraction of valuable bioactives from food by-products and medicinal herbs, framed within broader thesis research on sustainable bioactive extraction.

Quantitative Analysis of Extraction Efficiency

Extraction Yields from Medicinal Plants

Table 1: SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction Yields from Selected Medicinal Plants

Plant Material	Family	Total Extraction Yield (%)	Key Bioactive Compounds Identified
Chamomile	Asteraceae	7.20	Sesquiterpenes, Spiroethers, Bisabolol oxides
St. John's wort	Hypericaceae	4.92	Phenolic compounds, Terpenes
Yarrow	Asteraceae	4.40	Fatty acids, Terpenoids
Curry plant	Asteraceae	3.75	Volatile oils, Antioxidants

Source: Adapted from [97]

Bioactive Compound Spectra from Agro-Forest Wastes

Table 2: Bioactive Compounds Extracted from Agri-Food By-Products Using SC-COâ‚‚

Compound Class	Extraction Efficiency Without Co-solvent	Extraction Efficiency With Co-solvent	Representative Sources
Fatty acids	High	Slight improvement	Fruit seeds, Nut by-products
Monoterpenes & Sesquiterpenes	High	Moderate improvement	Citrus peels, Herbaceous wastes
Diterpenoids	Moderate to High	Significant improvement	Coffee grounds, Spice wastes
Low-polarity phenolic acids & triterpenoids	Moderate	Notable improvement	Olive pomace, Fruit skins
High-polarity phenolic acids & flavonoids	Not extractable	Essential for extraction	Grape seeds, Apple pomace
Carotenoids	Not extractable	Essential for extraction	Tomato peels, Carrot pomace
Tannins	Not extractable	Essential for extraction	Pomegranate rind, Tree barks

Source: Adapted from [99]

Experimental Protocols

Standardized SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction Protocol for Medicinal Herbs

Materials and Equipment

• Supercritical fluid extraction system with COâ‚‚ supply
• COâ‚‚ purity: 99.99%
• Collection vessels
• Analytical balance (±0.0001 g)
• Plant material: dried and ground (250-500 μm particle size)
• Co-solvents (if required): ethanol, methanol, water (HPLC grade)

Sample Preparation

• Plant Material Processing: Air-dry fresh plant materials at 25°C in darkness until constant weight.
• Size Reduction: Grind using a laboratory mill and sieve to 250-500 μm particle size.
• Moisture Control: Ensure moisture content <10% (w/w) to prevent ice formation during extraction.
• Extraction Vessel Loading: Pack ground material evenly into extraction vessel (avoid channeling).

Extraction Parameters

• Temperature: 40-60°C (optimize based on target compounds)
• Pressure: 25-35 MPa (adjust for selectivity)
• COâ‚‚ Flow Rate: 1.5-2.5 L/min (measured as expanded gas)
• Extraction Time: 90-180 minutes (monitor extraction curve)
• Co-solvent Addition (if needed for polar compounds): 1-10% ethanol or methanol

Collection and Storage

• Collection Temperature: 15-25°C below extraction temperature
• Collection Pressure: 5-6 MPa
• Storage: Refrigerate at 4°C in amber vials under nitrogen atmosphere
• Shelf-life: 2-5 years with proper storage [100]

Advanced Protocol: SC-COâ‚‚ with Cyclodextrin Complexation for Enhanced Bioavailability

Materials Preparation

• Drug compound (0.5-2.0 g)
• Cyclodextrin (βCD, HPβCD, or derivatives, 5-20 g)
• Moisture content adjustment: 10-25% (w/w) for SC-COâ‚‚ insoluble cyclodextrins
• SC-COâ‚‚ soluble cyclodextrins (e.g., peracetylated-βCD) for alternative methods

Complexation Methods

Method A: Supercritical Solvent Impregnation

• Prepare physical mixture of drug and cyclodextrin
• Load into high-pressure vessel
• Pressurize with COâ‚‚ to 10-20 MPa at 40-60°C
• Maintain for 2-4 hours with stirring if possible
• Depressurize slowly (0.5-1.0 MPa/min)

Method B: Particle Formation Techniques

• Dissolve both drug and cyclodextrin in appropriate solvent (e.g., methanol)
• Introduce solution into SC-COâ‚‚ (acts as antisolvent)
• Precipitate complexed particles at 10-15 MPa, 35-45°C
• Maintain SC-COâ‚‚ flow to remove residual solvent

Characterization and Validation

• Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): Confirm complex formation
• X-ray Diffraction: Analyze crystalline structures
• FTIR Spectroscopy: Identify molecular interactions
• SEM: Examine particle morphology [98]

Visualization of Workflows and Pathways

Integrated Biorefinery Approach for Agri-Food Waste Valorization

Integrated Valorization Workflow

Experimental Decision Pathway for SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction

Extraction Parameter Selection

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Materials for SC-COâ‚‚ Extraction of Bioactives

Category	Specific Items	Function & Application Notes
SC-COâ‚‚ Systems	Analytical-scale SFE systems (5-100 mL vessel volume)	Method development and small-scale extraction
	Preparative-scale SFE systems (100-5000 mL vessel volume)	Larger-scale production for compound isolation
Co-solvents	Ethanol (Pharmaceutical Grade)	Polar co-solvent for flavonoids, phenolic acids
	Methanol (HPLC Grade)	High-efficiency polar co-solvent for analytical work
	Water (HPLC Grade)	Co-solvent for highly polar compounds
Cyclodextrins	β-cyclodextrin (βCD)	Natural cyclodextrin for complexation
	Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD)	Enhanced solubility for pharmaceutical applications
	Peracetylated-β-cyclodextrin (PAβCD)	SC-CO₂ soluble derivative for advanced complexation
Analytical Standards	Terpene standards (Bisabolol, Farnesene)	Quantification of terpenoid compounds
	Phenolic acid standards (Gallic, Ferulic acid)	Quantification of phenolic antioxidants
	Flavonoid standards (Quercetin, Rutin)	Quantification of flavonoid compounds
Characterization Tools	DSC calibration standards	Thermal analysis validation
	FTIR reference materials	Spectral comparison and compound identification
	HPLC-MS grade solvents	Advanced chromatographic analysis

Technological Synergies and Future Perspectives

The integration of machine learning approaches with SC-CO₂ technology represents the cutting edge of extraction optimization. Recent studies demonstrate that XGBoost algorithms can predict drug solubility in SC-CO₂ with remarkable accuracy (R² = 0.9984, RMSE = 0.0605), significantly reducing experimental trial requirements [10]. These computational tools enable researchers to model complex relationships between compound properties (critical temperature, pressure, acentric factor, molecular weight) and optimal extraction parameters.

Furthermore, the application of SC-CO₂ extends beyond extraction to include sterilization and preservation. SC-CO₂ effectively inactivates microbial spores through mechanisms involving cellular content release, protein degradation, and enzymatic deactivation, making it valuable for pharmaceutical and food safety applications [101]. This dual functionality – extraction and sterilization – positions SC-CO₂ as a comprehensive processing technology for functional ingredient production.

Future research directions should focus on:

• Industrial scalability of integrated biorefinery approaches
• Advanced complexation techniques for improved bioavailability of poorly soluble bioactives
• Hybrid methodologies combining SC-COâ‚‚ with other green technologies (e.g., enzymatic treatment, ultrasound)
• Circular economy implementation through complete utilization of agro-food waste streams

These advances collectively support the transition toward sustainable bioeconomy models while providing researchers with robust tools for bioactive compound discovery and utilization from underutilized biological resources.

Conclusion

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide extraction stands as a powerful, sustainable, and highly efficient platform for isolating a wide spectrum of bioactive compounds crucial for pharmaceutical research and drug development. The synthesis of knowledge across the four intents confirms that SC-CO2 not only matches but often surpasses conventional methods in yield and purity while uniquely preserving the integrity of heat-sensitive bioactives. Its tunability, facilitated by parameter optimization and co-solvent use, allows for precise targeting of specific compounds. Future directions should focus on overcoming scalability challenges, reducing initial investment costs, and further integrating SFE with analytical chromatography for real-time monitoring. The continued valorization of agricultural and herbal by-products through this technology presents a significant opportunity for developing standardized, high-value nutraceutical and pharmaceutical ingredients, paving the way for more sustainable and effective therapeutic discoveries.

References

• 1. Supercritical carbon dioxide [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_carbon_dioxide]
• 2. Supercritical CO2 technology for biomass extraction: Review [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926669025008945]
• 3. 2.11.4. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (Sc-CO2) Extraction ... [https://bio-protocol.org/exchange/minidetail?id=17787766&type=30]
• 4. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and Its Potential as a Life- ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4206850/]
• 5. The advantages of supercritical CO2 [https://sfe-process.com/the-advantages-of-supercritical-co2/]
• 6. All the advantages of supercritical CO2 as a solvent ... [https://separeco.com/articles/all-the-advantages-of-supercritical-co2-as-a-solvent-according-to-experts/]
• 7. Environmental impacts of supercritical fluids processes [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003038]
• 8. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of lipids and ... [https://biotechnologyforbiofuels.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13068-025-02632-7]
• 9. Optimizing ethanol-modified supercritical COâ‚‚ extraction ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-91441-x]
• 10. Predicting drug solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-24006-7]
• 11. Recent advancements toward the incremsent of drug ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402729/]
• 12. High-Fidelity Prediction of Drug Solubility in Supercritical ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098725003197]
• 13. Recent Advances in Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Natural ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7504334/]
• 14. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Bioactive ... [https://www.gavinpublishers.com/article/view/supercritical-carbon-dioxide-extraction-of-bioactive-compounds]
• 15. Supercritical CO2 Extraction Process: Step-by-Step Guide [https://www.rootsciences.com/blog/supercritical-co2-extraction-process/]
• 16. Complete Guide for CO2 Extraction Process [https://amygalper.com/co2-extracts-explained/]
• 17. Simultaneous quantitative screening of 53 phytochemicals ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1513875/full]
• 18. Supercritical CO2 Extraction vs. Hexane ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11644741/]
• 19. Supercritical CO2 extraction, chemical composition, and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9360582/]
• 20. Optimizing Supercritical CO2 Solid-Liquid Extraction with ... [https://www.alicat.com/support/why-supercritical-co2-is-super-cool/]
• 21. Supercritical Extraction Techniques for Obtaining ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/13/11/1713]
• 22. Supercritical CO2 Extraction System Market [https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/6079685/supercritical-co2-extraction-system-market?srsltid=AfmBOoq_ebsZBt3Q82DAPO9DV0pS0yw122qm5RHb1ud6nTIhuf3EEsDf]
• 23. Experimental Design, Modelling and Optimization [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/18/5884]
• 24. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Carotenoids ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4013658/]
• 25. Valorization of bioactive compounds from food by-products ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814625015286]
• 26. A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7841323/]
• 27. Application Notes [https://www.supercriticalfluids.com/technical-resources/applications-notes/]
• 28. Carbon Dioxide Supercritical Extraction - an overview [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/carbon-dioxide-supercritical-extraction]
• 29. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Supercritical CO2 Extraction ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/10/11/1185]
• 30. How to Optimize Supercritical CO2 Extraction Parameters [https://www.co2extractionmachine.com/blog/how-to-optimize-supercritical-co2-extraction-parameters-a-practical-guide.html]
• 31. The optimization of essential oils supercritical CO2 extraction ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4285650/]
• 32. Supercritical-CO2 extraction, identification and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8018978/]
• 33. Synergistic Effects of Pressure, Temperature, CO2 Flow Rate ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12248829/]
• 34. Process optimization for the supercritical carbondioxide ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-89772-6]
• 35. Effect of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5484124/]
• 36. Extractability, selectivity, and comprehensiveness in ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967323004922]
• 37. Valorization of bioactive compounds from food by-products ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40252440/]
• 38. Extraction of Flavonoids From Natural Sources Using Modern ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7546908/]
• 39. Selectivity of Current Extraction Techniques for Flavonoids ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/8/10/1222]
• 40. Comparison of Different Green Extraction Techniques ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/12/7/1461]
• 41. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of bioactive ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22072923/]
• 42. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Bioactive ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/12/10/6856]
• 43. Optimization of supercritical fluid extraction of polar ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212982023000513]
• 44. Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of total ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1540631/full]
• 45. Flavonoid Extraction and Detection Methods [https://metabolomics.creative-proteomics.com/resource/flavonoid-metabolites-and-detection-methods.htm]
• 46. Nutritional Benefits of Lycopene and Beta‐Carotene [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11606860/]
• 47. Carotenoids: Dietary Sources, Extraction, Encapsulation ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9025559/]
• 48. Supercritical Extraction of Lycopene from Tomato Industrial ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6269079/]
• 49. Carotenoids Recovery Enhancement by Supercritical CO 2 ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/12/2656]
• 50. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of lycopene: A review [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0260877412002336]
• 51. Composition and Antioxidant Activity, Supercritical Carbon ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/9/3/467]
• 52. Optimizing ethanol-modified supercritical COâ‚‚ extraction ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11904181/]
• 53. Optimizing Ethanol-Water Cosolvent Systems for Green ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39959095/]
• 54. Supercritical CO2 extraction of lipids and bioactives from ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10811-025-03534-9]
• 55. Response surface methodology applied to supercritical ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643814000322]
• 56. Response surface methodology for supercritical CO2 ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926669024021484]
• 57. Optimization of supercritical fluid extraction of essential oils ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4486533/]
• 58. The supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of polyphenols ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0896844614003428]
• 59. Optimising Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/13/3/655]
• 60. Optimization of an Aqueous Enzymatic Method and ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/2/555]
• 61. Optimization and Enzymatic Intensification of Bioactive ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000713]
• 62. Optimization of extraction and structural characterization of ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-24874-z]
• 63. A comparative study of extraction methods for recovery ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11695544/]
• 64. Techniques for Obtaining Biologically Active... Supercritical Extraction [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11171758/]
• 65. Understanding particle properties and their impact on ... [https://jenike.com/particle-properties-impact-on-material-handling/]
• 66. Rapid and Non-Destructive Estimation of Moisture Content ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/17/7592]
• 67. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction technology [https://endemicprocess.com/blog-detay/supercritical-carbon-dioxide-extraction-technology]
• 68. Greener Extraction Solutions for Microalgal Compounds [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12298023/]
• 69. Bioactive Seaweed in Personal Care Set to Hit 29.58 ... [https://fox40.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/870769122/bioactive-seaweed-in-personal-care-set-to-hit-29-58-billion-dollars-by-2033-on-surge-in-natural-beauty-demand-sri]
• 70. Supercritical CO2 Extractor Market Driver [https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/supercritical-co2-extractor-market-112950]
• 71. Economic evaluation of a promising strategy for the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960308525001579]
• 72. Sustainable Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Food ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/13/11/3611]
• 73. Optimization of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Fluid ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/11/7/1953]
• 74. Supercritical-CO2 extraction, identification and ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-86393-x]
• 75. Supercritical CO2 extraction of bioactives from P. ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896844625001883]
• 76. HPLC Analysis of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6268625/]
• 77. Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11946826/]
• 78. Green Extraction of Plant Materials Using Supercritical CO2 [https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/13/16/2295]
• 79. Supercritical fluid CO 2 extraction, simultaneous ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10600-012-0338-6]
• 80. Biological activities in supercritical COâ‚‚-extracted cannabis [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0896844625000932]
• 81. Recent Advances in Supercritical CO2 Extraction of ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/3/1410]
• 82. Comparative analysis of extraction technologies for plant ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11911331/]
• 83. Optimization of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9598708/]
• 84. Optimization of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/11/10/1960]
• 85. Supercritical COâ‚‚ extraction of Clinacanthus nutans [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12610283/]
• 86. Combined enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction and ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41072221/]
• 87. Evaluation of Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activity ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12384079/]
• 88. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Four Medicinal ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/18/5697]
• 89. Solvent Supercritical Fluid Technologies to Extract ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6152233/]
• 90. Supercritical CO2 elimination of solvent residues from ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0896844621001650]
• 91. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of lipids and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927318/]
• 92. Extraction of Bioactive Compounds Using Supercritical ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6412529/]
• 93. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Seed Oil from ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/18/1/997]
• 94. Supercritical CO2 and Conventional Extraction of Bioactive ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/13/20/2931]
• 95. Recent Advances in Eco-Friendly Supercritical Carbon ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40708463/]
• 96. Recent advances in biotechnological valorization of agro ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X24000641]
• 97. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Four Medicinal ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8468049/]
• 98. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide as a Green Alternative to ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8230899/]
• 99. Review Composing functional food from agro-forest wastes ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814624014985]
• 100. CO2 Extracts [https://www.theherbarie.com/CO2-Extracts/]
• 101. Application of supercritical fluid carbon dioxide in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8814202/]